Search for: "Virgin v. Virgin" Results 401 - 420 of 1,036
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Tuesday 2 May, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council will hear the appeal of Alves v AG of the Virgin Islands (British Virgin Islands). [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 4:02 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
On Monday 12 October the Privy Council will hand down judgment in Pinard-Byrne v Lennox Linton (Dominica) and Milton & Anor v The Queen (British Virgin Islands). [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 2:02 pm
The Commission received a complaint from Virgin Atlantic Airways on the way British Airways operated an incentive scheme for travel agents to sell British Airways tickets. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 11:39 am by Howard M. Wasserman
In an opinion laden with Chief Justice John Roberts’ historical and rhetorical flourishes, a unanimous Supreme Court in Hall v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:13 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
It is well established that a juror cannot be seated if the juror is some degree of relation to one of the principle in the case, i.e., a party or an attorney. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:51 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 803(5) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for A record that: (A) is on a matter the witness once knew about but now cannot recall well enough to testify fully and accurately; (B) was... [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:40 am
 On the principle of the matter, he stated at 111:In my judgment this reasoning [from Rohm & Haas] is persuasive, and it is supported by the subsequent judgment of the Court of Appeal in Virgin v Premium. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 2:02 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 10 June and Thursday 11 June 2020, the Privy Council will hear the appeal of Ciban Management Corporation v Citco (BVI) Ltd & Anor (British Virgin Islands). [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 5:29 am
Although its caption suggests a prize fight, when the Supreme Court hears oral arguments tomorrow in No. 06-116, Moylan v. [read post]