Search for: "WOLF v. STATE"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,760
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2018, 9:55 am
By Pamela Wolf, J.D. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:36 am
Terminating a Honda dealership employee because his girlfriend bought a Honda from a competitor did not violate a clear mandate of public policy to make his discharge wrongful, a Missouri appeals court ruled (Hedrick v Jay Wolfe Imports I, LLC, July 30, 2013, Witt, G). [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 5:52 pm
Defenders of Wildlife v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 4:24 am
” At National Review, Carrie Severino calls Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:16 am
E.L., in which the Justices ruled that states must recognize an adoption by a same-sex parent that occurred in another state, comes from David Savage of the Los Angeles Times, German Lopez of Vox, Richard Wolf of USA Today, Danielle Blevins of Talk Radio News, Samuel Lieberman of New York, Adam Liptak of The New York Times, Nolan McCaskill of Politico, and Chris Geidner of BuzzFeed. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 11:32 am
” Petitioners also argued that the map violated the equal-population rule of Wesberry v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm
In Shelby County v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 6:19 am
By Pamela Wolf, J.D. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:36 am
At USA Today, Richard Wolf looks at the Court and same-sex marriage, writing that, “even after the high court rules — most likely by striking down state bans on gay marriage at the end of its term in June — the fight won’t be over. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 6:22 am
Supreme Court oral argument in North Carolina State Bd. of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 7:44 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Hurst v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 4:05 am
In Whitewood v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 4:30 am
Immigration QuotasAmalia Pallares, Undocumented Activism, Immigrant “worthiness” and access to citizenshipBook session: Eileen Boris and Jennifer Klein, Caring for America: A Conversation on Home Care Workers, Race, Gender, and the Welfare State Leon Fink -- ChairKimberly Morgan -- DiscussantNancy MacLean -- DiscussantCynthia Cranford -- DiscussantKaren Flynn -- DiscussantEileen Boris -- AuthorJennifer Klein -- Author Negotiating Anew National Legislation and School… [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 4:02 am
” At the Special Education Law Blog, Jim Gehrl weighs in on Endrew F. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 3:53 am
” For National Affairs, Joel Alicea and John Ohlendorf write that New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 4:38 am
” At Courthouse News Service, Barbara Leonard looks at Murphy v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 6:45 am
By Pamela Wolf, J.D. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 5:21 am
California and United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:59 pm
Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“Starbucks V”) concluding that Starbucks failed to prove that the defendant’s use of the marks MISTER CHARBUCKS and CHARBUCKS BLEND is likely to dilute Starbucks’s famous marks including, of course, STARBUCKS. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:21 am
By Pamela Wolf, J.D. [read post]
