Search for: "Wales v. United States"
Results 401 - 420
of 756
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2015, 2:09 am
On ‘street homeless’, this is not to be found in the 1996 Act (though it is in s.71 Housing (Wales) Act 2014 – largely by importing the court’s account of the Pereira test!). [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
Sundara Rajan, Professor of Intellectual Property Law, University of Glasgow, depicts a fascinating drama in which the principal actors are two literary ladies and, making a relatively rare appearance centre stage, the United States Postal Service. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 4:36 pm
BBC Wales reports that it has been told by a UKIP general election candidate that she is planning to sue the party for libel and harassment. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 2:19 am
United States The defamation trial against HBO over a “hoax” child labour report has begun with a statement by the attorney for Mitre Sports International. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:46 am
There was still no infringement or passing off so far as SCRABBLE v SCRAMBLE was concerned, however. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 4:02 pm
United States Georgia’s Supreme Court has ruled against a woman who claimed she was stalked online. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
United States, 333 US 46 (1948), the United States Supreme Court ruled that res ipsa loquitur applied in Jesionowski v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am
It is reported that 90% of voters in the United States support the right to delete links to personal information. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 5:07 pm
Lunkenheimer Co. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
* The IPKat weblog and the European Patent Office: some points of clarificationMerpel and you need to talk.* Offering a service is not use in commerce Under Lanham Act, says Federal Circuit Court Blogger and recent guest Kat Marie-Andrée Weiss explains the ruling in David Couture v Playdom, a Federal Circuit's decision that highlights a difference of approach between the trade mark law of the United States and that of the European Union as regards the… [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 1:42 pm
Supreme Court ruling in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm
United States In the case of Simorangkir v Courtney Love Cobain the Court of Appeal of the State of California dismissed an appeal by Courtney Love seeking to have the case dismissed under California’s anti-SLAPP statute. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 5:30 am
This provision was interpreted by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Zeran v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
However, last week’s High Court, England and Wales, ruling in Enterprise v Europcar [2015] EWHC 300 (Ch) shows this is by no means a settled area, explains katfriend Jeremy Blum(Bristows LLP).* The Richemont ruling and beyond: dealing with counterfeit websites and the intermediaries that host themKatfriend Tim Behean provides another insightful analysis of Cartier International AG and Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others [2014]… [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 7:59 am
The Advocate General also stated that a local employment unit could be determined by member states, and would be on the facts of each case. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 4:30 am
U.S., United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit http://t.co/Do5m1gpjTY -> Fighting ‘Revenge Porn’ through Copyright http://t.co/0hif97mlfH -> The Canadian Privacy Cases of 2014 http://t.co/VJWAE4vdck -> Coalition of Copyright Industries Highlights Major Impediments to Foreign Markets In 'Special 301' Submission http://t.co/Xr6YG5EySF -> A Constitutional Right to Technology? [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 4:30 am
http://t.co/DGSN5M0WQQ -> US: Gaylord v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 6:30 am
This article analyses how a young man who might have been marginalized in society because of the circumstances of his birth, ethnic origin, and religious identity rose to prominence in law, politics, and business in the United Kingdom and the United States. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
The case in question is Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH [2015] EWCA Civ 54, a decision of the Court of Appeal, England and Wales, last Friday. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 10:31 am
The same patent was previously held invalid by the UK Courts for lack of novelty as a result an invalid priority right in Novartis v Hospira (see [2013 EWCA 516 (Pat.) and [2013] EWCA Civ 1663). [read post]
