Search for: "Walker v. State" Results 401 - 420 of 2,571
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2008, 7:28 pm
In two cases, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals issued rulings emphasizing the rights of defendants to cross-examine prosecution witnesses regarding evidence of their racial or ethnic bias.In Brinson v Walker (--- F.3d ----, 2008 WL 4890153 [2nd Cir 11/13/08])the court granted habeas corpus relief and vacated a New York state robbery conviction whee the New York trial judge precluded the black defendant from presenting evidence (both through cross examination and by… [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm by Christopher Brown, Matrix.
As to this latter question, the Court’s answer was “yes”, Lord Walker dissenting. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:14 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Walker The First Amendment Free Speech clause states, “Congress . . . shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 3:01 am
  The depositions in question were taken in another case, McFarland v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 11:38 am by Calvin Massey
The Supreme Court heard oral argument today in Walker v. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 8:12 am by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
Brent Walker writes (in WaPo): Justice Stevens has been a friend of church-state separation. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 6:02 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Johnny Walker v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:49 am
  The bill, introduced at Governor Walker’s request, passed both houses of the state legislature during special session. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 3:44 am by Russ Bensing
  Too late, says the court in State v. [read post]
Walker ruled Thursday that the state of Florida’s employee health insurance plan violates Title VII employee protections against discrimination on the basis of sex. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 11:50 am by William Eskridge - Guest
Supreme Court handle the appeal in Perry v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am by Kirsten Sjvoll, Matrix Chambers
It is established in Strasbourg and domestic jurisprudence that in certain “well-defined circumstances” art 2 will impose “a positive obligation on [state] authorities to take preventative operational measure” to protect the life of an individual (Osman v UK (2009) 29 EHRR 245 at 115). [read post]