Search for: "Warne v. State" Results 401 - 420 of 14,119
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2023, 10:46 am by David J. Halberg, Esq.
In 2020, the Florida Supreme Court affirmed the state’s stringent statute of limitations on civil sexual assault cases in the matter of  R.R. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by INFORRM
Newspaper Journalism and regulation Staff at the Telegraph have been warned in the official policy that using ChatGPT will result in the same sanctions as plagiarism, according to the Press Gazette. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:37 am by David Pocklington
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 1:07 am by Frank Cranmer
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 12:07 pm by Race to the Bottom
Despite the SEC’s warnings and successful litigation streak, recent lawsuits appear to tip the scales. [read post]
 The Ninth Circuit found that the State of California cannot compel businesses to provide a Prop 65 warning for glyphosate, the most commonly used herbicide in the world. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
It does not mean that processes cannot be changed for all parties – presumably with some warning. [read post]
 The Ninth Circuit found that the State of California cannot compel businesses to provide a Prop 65 warning for glyphosate, the most commonly used herbicide in the world. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
Master Bell stated that he “thought long and hard about whether or not to strike out Ms O’Neill’s action in the light of this jurisprudence and came close to doing so” [46]. [read post]