Search for: "Washington v. USA" Results 401 - 420 of 1,572
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2008, 7:30 am
Don Campbell’s commentary for USA Today, here, points to issues that he believes will not be resolved by the decision in D.C. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 6:53 am by Nabiha Syed
The Washington Post and Courthouse News Service recap the oral arguments in more depth. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 6:36 am by Conor McEvily
Monday’s news that the Court has ordered reargument in Kiobel v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:57 am by Dennis Crouch
Petitions Granted with immediate Vacatur and Remand (GVR) Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 3:28 pm by Kiera Flynn
Briefly: Yesterday in Camreta v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 6:21 am by Adam Chandler
David Savage of the Los Angeles Times, Bill Mears of CNN, Bob Barnes of the Washington Post, Bob Egelko of the San Francisco Chronicle, Joan Biskupic of USA Today, and Mark Sherman of the Associated Press (via the Washington Post) all predict that a majority of the Court will uphold the court order requiring California to reduce its prison population by some 40,000 inmates. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Hughes v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 7:25 am by Amanda Rice
Switzer and Kasten v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
” At Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog, William Koski discusses Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm by legalinformatics
Jason Jordan, University of North Texas: De Jure Blackness: Racialization in Brown v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:30 am by Erin Miller
 The Associated Press (via USA Today) has the story. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 6:41 am by Amanda Rice
The Court also heard argument in Williamson v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:46 am by Amy Howe
With the November sitting still a week away, the Justices are traveling outside Washington, D.C. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 12:12 pm by Howard Bashman
Supreme Court oral argument in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]