Search for: "Weaver v. Weaver" Results 401 - 420 of 623
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2015, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of Weaver v Corcoran and ors (2015 BCSC 165) claimant scientist Dr Andrew Weaver was awarded damages of Can $50,000 in respect of a series of articles in the National Post which alleged that he was untrustworthy, unscientific and incompetent. [read post]
1 May 2013, 7:37 am by S
Which is all very well if they are a local authority or housing association that meets the criteria in Weaver but what if they are a private landlord or housing association that does not meet the criteria in Weaver? [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:51 am by John Jascob
UBS Financial Services, Inc. (19-249): Whether the grant of an employee stock option is a “sale” of a security under the Securities Act of 1933.Isaacson/Weaver Family Trust v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 8:30 am by Aaron Lindstrom
 Justice Weaver dissented because she did not think the trial court committed clear error. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 5:15 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Chicago lawyer Richard Beem on his blog, Beem on Patents Remijas v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Miami lawyer Kara Nickel of Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson on the firm’s blog, BeLabor the Point Does Credit Counseling Work? [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:29 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Los Angeles attorney David Urban of Liebert Cassidy Whitmore on the firm’s California Public Agency Labor and Employment Blog The effect of government privatization on global M&A – Toronto attorney Sara Josselyn of Norton Rose on the firm’s blog, Deal Law Wire With Hiring On The Rise, Employers Should Review And Update Old Job Applications – Fort Lauderdale attorney Tobi Lebowitz of Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson on the… [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 8:55 am
  Justices Corrigan and Young concurred, Justice Weaver dissented based on the dissent in McGraw. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 4:57 pm
Starting from my post on an unclear mention in Inside Housing, it quickly became clear via the comments that R (Weaver) v London & Quadrant has been a full-on JR application on grounds that Housing Associations (or L&Q at least) are public authorities exercising a public function as landlord, and that a policy of using Ground 8 is unlawful (Thanks to J). [read post]