Search for: "Weeks v. State"
Results 401 - 420
of 41,804
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2024, 10:57 am
McCommons v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
Holder and Rucho v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
That is a lesson from John Courtney Murray.Murray died in 1967, before Pope Paul VI issued his famous letter against contraception and the Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 2:01 pm
But now, most cases are (and must be) e-filed, typically using service providers, and the case isn't technically "filed" until after the Clerk "processes" the complaint and officially "files" it, which may be several days (or even a week) later.(2) Both now and in the old days, you've got 30 days to remove a lawsuit from state court to federal court. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 11:48 am
Thayer v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:52 am
A list of this week’s featured petitions is below: John and Jane Parents 1 v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 7:13 am
Etienne Gadbois was sentenced to just under two years in jail last week. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
As SCOTUS explained in Sec'y of State of Md. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
In Sails v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:29 pm
Vox: “Moyle v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:34 pm
In Planned Parenthood Arizona, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:11 pm
United States, and Hikvision USA, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 1:40 pm
At present, the state authorizes abortions up to 15 weeks of gestation. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 4:05 am
Supreme Court last week in Hile v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
ENDNOTES [1] State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Last week, an Indiana appeals court ruled in favor of a group of plaintiffs who challenged the state’s restrictive abortion law on the ground that it interfered with their right to religious freedom. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 2:43 pm
In 2022 the Supreme Court of Canada considered the issue of family violence in Barendregt v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 1:25 pm
The lawsuit (State of Texas v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:05 am
McDaniel v. [read post]
