Search for: "Wells v. Heard*" Results 401 - 420 of 9,159
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2010, 10:39 am by Dave
Now, this is a really important point, I think (and not one that I'd given much thought to before reading the decision) because it does raise both a technical ground of appeal as well as, much more importantly in my eyes, an important right for the applicant on a review to make written/oral submissions (on which see our notes of Banks v Kingston-upon-Thames LBC [2009] HLR 29 & Lambeth LBC v Johnston [2009] HLR 10, esp at [53], again per Rimer LJ). [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:39 am by Dave
Now, this is a really important point, I think (and not one that I'd given much thought to before reading the decision) because it does raise both a technical ground of appeal as well as, much more importantly in my eyes, an important right for the applicant on a review to make written/oral submissions (on which see our notes of Banks v Kingston-upon-Thames LBC [2009] HLR 29 & Lambeth LBC v Johnston [2009] HLR 10, esp at [53], again per Rimer LJ). [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 6:04 am by INFORRM
Wilkinson v Downton is a legal curiosity well known to legal students. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
On 30 November 2016, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) heard oral arguments in Bărbulescu v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on November 3, 2010 in Kwikset Corp. v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 5:18 pm
Well, today the 3rd Circuit (USA -v- Albertson) declared that, for someone with a child porn conviction using the Internet, that banning his use of the Internet later was OVERBROAD. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 11:34 am
Twofold.First, it may well be closer to your residence, and hence more convenient for you. [read post]
25 May 2012, 5:35 am by INFORRM
  Such an order was refused by the same judge in Bento v Chief Constable of Bedfordshire earlier this year (a judgment subsequently upheld by the Court of Appeal). [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 7:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
Last week’s oral arguments in TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:43 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers.
Unfortunately, by “ditch[ing]” the residency requirement, the extension of the Act may well have gone further than the legislature intended or anticipated. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 6:10 pm by Howard Friedman
 But those invoking religion demonstrated in favor of marriage equality as well. [read post]