Search for: "Wells v. Heard*"
Results 401 - 420
of 9,202
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2010, 10:39 am
Now, this is a really important point, I think (and not one that I'd given much thought to before reading the decision) because it does raise both a technical ground of appeal as well as, much more importantly in my eyes, an important right for the applicant on a review to make written/oral submissions (on which see our notes of Banks v Kingston-upon-Thames LBC [2009] HLR 29 & Lambeth LBC v Johnston [2009] HLR 10, esp at [53], again per Rimer LJ). [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:39 am
Now, this is a really important point, I think (and not one that I'd given much thought to before reading the decision) because it does raise both a technical ground of appeal as well as, much more importantly in my eyes, an important right for the applicant on a review to make written/oral submissions (on which see our notes of Banks v Kingston-upon-Thames LBC [2009] HLR 29 & Lambeth LBC v Johnston [2009] HLR 10, esp at [53], again per Rimer LJ). [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 11:34 am
Twofold.First, it may well be closer to your residence, and hence more convenient for you. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 7:00 am
LS3, LLC v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:51 pm
"Well, now. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 6:04 am
Wilkinson v Downton is a legal curiosity well known to legal students. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on November 3, 2010 in Kwikset Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 4:41 pm
On 30 November 2016, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) heard oral arguments in Bărbulescu v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:43 am
Unfortunately, by “ditch[ing]” the residency requirement, the extension of the Act may well have gone further than the legislature intended or anticipated. [read post]
6 May 2011, 5:18 pm
Well, today the 3rd Circuit (USA -v- Albertson) declared that, for someone with a child porn conviction using the Internet, that banning his use of the Internet later was OVERBROAD. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 5:27 am
The circumstances of the government’s decision to deprive Shamima Begum of her citizenship are well known but deeply contested. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 8:03 am
Mozes v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 5:35 am
Such an order was refused by the same judge in Bento v Chief Constable of Bedfordshire earlier this year (a judgment subsequently upheld by the Court of Appeal). [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:11 am
In contrast to Cengiz and Others v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am
In National Assn of Broadcasters v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 8:38 am
State v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 3:48 pm
That never works out well. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 7:10 am
Well once we read the stinging and 100% correct rebuke from Tony Moss we spent some time meditating on this. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 1:02 pm
Supreme Court—South Dakota v. [read post]
