Search for: "Wells v. Smith" Results 401 - 420 of 4,910
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2012, 3:21 am by Dianne Saxe
Class actions for historic contamination: Sydney Tar Ponds and Smith v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 2:24 am by gmlevine
This is when the lexical elements “eliminate the possibility of confusion,” Morgan Stanley and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Holdings LLC v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 11:37 am
 But at 50 pages, unless you're fascinated by mootness issues, the debate between Judges Milan Smith and Wallace is probably, well, moot.To be fair, though, the standing issue arises in the context of Proposition 8. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 3:51 am by Amanda Sanders (UK)
The UK  Court of Appeal has given its judgment in the case of Smith v Pimlico Plumbers and has allowed the appeal by the appellant in relation to his claim for holiday pay. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 12:26 pm
Let's just say: It did not turn out well for Mr. [read post]
This post is the second of four, considering the decision of Smith J in Lidl v Tesco [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch), focusing on the passing off element of the judgment. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 10:04 am by INFORRM
The reader or hearer should be in a position to judge for himself how far the comment was well founded” [19]. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 7:56 am by Eric Goldman
Ozimals * 17 USC 512(f) Claim Against “Twilight” Studio Survives Motion to Dismiss–Smith v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 12:15 pm
At Wal-Marts as well as plenty of other places as well. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 11:00 am by Dave
In R(Alansi) v Newham LBC, Stuart-Smith J held that, although Ms Alansi had a legitimate expectation that she would remain a priority homeseeker on Newham’s housing register, Newham had not acted unreasonably and in abuse of its power by withdrawing its representation. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
The case of Smith v Unknown Defendants [2016] EWHC 1775 (QB) was a libel action against unknown defendants who had published defamatory material on a website, the Queen’s Bench Division granted the claimant’s application for default judgment against the second defendant in his absence and granted summary relief of £10,000 in damages as well as injunctions prohibiting publication of further allegations and requiring the removal of any allegations… [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 5:32 am
It's not yet available on BAILII, but the decision of Mr Justice Peter Smith (Chancery Division, England and Wales) in the latest episode of JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Another v Zynga, Inc [2013] EWHC 3348 (Ch) (on which see earlier Katposts here and here) is well worth a read. [read post]