Search for: "Wells v. State Bar"
Results 401 - 420
of 14,088
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 1:04 pm
From a supplement to a self-represented appellant's brief in Shaver v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:52 am
The Secretary of State could have sought to lift the limitation on a pending review as barring removal. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 9:40 am
. * After II Movie, LLC v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 12:33 pm
From Richwine v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:06 am
Section § 230 thus remains a complete bar to the claims for violation of §§ 349 and 350 of the New York General Business Law. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 2:31 pm
The OPM Debarment Process – Responding to an FEHBP Debarment or Suspension Action in 2024 (December 20, 2023): Most health care providers and suppliers are familiar with the fact that as a participating provider in the Medicare and / or Medicaid programs, certain criminal convictions, adverse licensure actions, and various types of prohibited conduct may subject the provider to exclusion from participation in Federal health care programs[1] by the… [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
See Walsh v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
The law societies have stated that the aim of the WWCP is to “help inform lawyer training and education, including bar admission program development and experiential learning opportunities. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:06 pm
Pierce explained that in 1983, the Supreme Court’s MVMA v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:00 pm
The plaintiffs’ bar was emboldened to take another run at these privacy “gotcha” lawsuits focusing on common website tools after two circuit court decisions from 2022 – Javier v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 2:31 pm
"] From Elden v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:00 am
Other issuesTwo remaining issues which the Court commented on, although strictly unnecessary for the purposes of its ruling, were: When did acquiescence cease: the Court held that merely sending a warning letter is not enough to cease acquiescence, unless a claim form or other legal action is issued shortly thereafter; and Passing off: in the Court's ruling, the defence of acquiescence, if it applied, would also have barred the Claimant's claims for passing off, as… [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
The State Law Libraries Outreach Initiative to strengthen the ties between the Law Library of Congress and state law libraries continues. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Periodically on Thursdays, we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 1:28 am
Legal background: Basis for selections from listsThe EPO has a famously strict bar for basis. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 6:22 pm
"District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm
The Departments establishment of the IDR fee for post-February 20, 2025 disputes and their previous December 15, 2023 announcement of the full reopening of the IDR portal for all dispute categories are part of the Departments’ ongoing response to the August 3, 2023 Federal District court ruling in Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 11:11 am
Mobil Oil Corp. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 8:57 am
In this post, David McKie, Partner, and Dany Bitar, Associate in the litigation team at CMS, preview the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Argentum Exploration Ltd (Respondent) v Republic of South Africa (Appellant). [read post]
