Search for: "White v. United States" Results 401 - 420 of 6,560
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2008, 9:48 am
United States that emphasized the discretion federal judges have even under the Sentencing Guidelines to shape sentences that reflect the individual circumstances of the defendant. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:41 pm by Sandy Levinson
 [It should be clear, incidentally, that Burns violated the law by fleeing his confinement as a slave, and the august Supreme Court, in the worst single decision in our history, worse even than Dred Scott, upheld the Fugitive Slave Law of 1893 in Prigg v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 2:38 pm
In the United States, it is a more bottom up, market based approach. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:20 am by Eric Goldman
Fyk received his requested relief against the United States, what would change? [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 2:58 pm
On June 29, 2009, the Supreme Court addressed a provocative question about the current state of workplace diversity in the United States. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
The title of the article is The Quiet Coup, and it's introductory paragraph changed my whole year… The crash has laid bare many unpleasant truths about the United States. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:57 am by NCC Staff
On April 10, 1967, the United States Supreme Court held oral arguments in a landmark case about a Virginia law that said marriages between blacks and whites should be treated as a felony. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 8:21 am by Brian Shiffrin
"The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees a defendant the right to be confronted with the witnesses against him [or her]' " (People v Brown, 13 NY3d 332, 338). [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 5:06 am by Bob Bauer
As the court stated repeatedly, it was adopting the same position as the district court in Committee on the Judiciary, United States House of Representatives Committee on Judiciary v. [read post]