Search for: "Wilson, Appeal of" Results 401 - 420 of 3,554
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2011, 5:02 pm
The trial judge who was overruled, Dan Wilson, is highly respected as well; 78% of the criminal defense lawyers in Collin County voted him as "excellent" in terms of impartiality in 2008. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 1:56 am
"The Court of Appeal found no arguable ground for appeal and therefore refused the application for permission. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 12:21 pm
In his post, Ted mentioned the oft-cited example of Bertha Wilson, the former research lawyer who, as we all know, went on to be a highly respected Court of Appeal and Supreme Court Justice. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 7:40 pm by Howard Bashman
“Supreme Court rejects GOP proposal to elect regional justices”: Sam Wilson of The Helena (Mont.) [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 2:09 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 183 (12 March 2008) Furniss v Firth Brown Tools Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 182 (12 March 2008) Emmott v Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 184 (12 March 2008) Kelly & Ors R. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 10:38 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Peakman v Linbrooke Services Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 1239 (13 November 2008) H v Tomlinson [2008] EWCA Civ 1258 (13 November 2008) High Court (Technology and Construction Court) Allen Wilson Joinery Ltd v Privetgrange Construction Ltd [2008] EWHC 2802 (TCC) (17 November 2008) Fosse Motor Engineers Ltd & Ors v Conde Nast & National Magazine Distributors Ltd & Ors [2008] EWHC 2527 (TCC) (30 September 2008) Biffa Waste Services Ltd… [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:26 am by Dave
The headlines, though, are: (a) Ms Jones won the appeal so that her 90% share in the disputed property was re-instated; (b) the UKSC agree on the outcome but there is disagreement on the principles (esp Lord Wilson with Lord Kerr somewhere between); (c) the majority, in essence, follow Stack but, it might be said, with a slight change of emphasis or, more politely, with more explanation about inferring/imputing shares; (d) Lord Walker and Baroness Hale, who gave a joint judgment,… [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:26 am by Dave
The headlines, though, are: (a) Ms Jones won the appeal so that her 90% share in the disputed property was re-instated; (b) the UKSC agree on the outcome but there is disagreement on the principles (esp Lord Wilson with Lord Kerr somewhere between); (c) the majority, in essence, follow Stack but, it might be said, with a slight change of emphasis or, more politely, with more explanation about inferring/imputing shares; (d) Lord Walker and Baroness Hale, who gave a joint judgment,… [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:48 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Cook Biotech Incorporated v Edwards Lifesciences AG [2010] EWCA Civ 718 (28 June 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Wilson v London Borough of Harrow [2010] EWHC 1574 (QB) (28 June 2010) High Court (Commercial Court) Redmayne Bentley Stockbrokers v Isaacs & Ors [2010] EWHC 1504 (Comm) (28 June 2010) High Court (Technology and Construction Court) Price & Anor v Carter (t/a Ian Carter Building Contractors) [2010] EWHC 1451… [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 7:25 am by emagraken
Wilson, 2007 BCCA 622 at para. 109: “Material contribution”, as that phrase was used in Athey v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:10 am by INFORRM
In a judgment handed down today ([2017] UKSC 49) the UK Supreme Court, by a majority of 5:2, dismissed the appeal of the claimant from the refusal of Tugendhat J and the Court of Appeal to grant an injunction to prevent his name being disclosed in connection with a criminal investigation. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:50 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
In Courtroom 1 this morning until Tuesday 10 July 2012 is the appeal of BCL Old Co Ltd & ors v BASF plc & ors, to be heard by Lords Phillips, Walker, Mance, Clarke, and Wilson. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 1:44 pm by Aurora Barnes
The petition of the day is: Wilson v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 10:04 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
Wilson appealed the decision, challenging the plaintiff's expert witness's testimony, and alleging that he had somehow assumed the risk of injury by wearing their mask. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 9:33 am by Florian Mueller
Koh's reasoning on chipset licensing, presenting a right-for-the-wrong-reasons theory instead.Qualcomm seeks to leverage that fact to discredit Judge Koh's ruling as a whole, and in this context reminds the appeals court of FTC commissioner Wilson's dissent, and support for Qualcomm from the DOJ Antitrust Division (which is run by a lawyer who previously represented Qualcomm). [read post]