Search for: "Windsor v. State"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,338
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2014, 11:40 am
On December 12, 2014, CMS published a proposed rule to revise selected conditions of participation (CoPs) for providers, conditions for coverage (CfCs) for suppliers, and requirements for long-term care (LTC) facilities to conform with the Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 10:38 am
The Court of Appeals split over that factual issue in Gagnon v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 4:00 am
Even before an appeal to the intermediate appellate court ("Circuit Court"), the plaintiffs in the case, Windsor v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 3:13 pm
” He goes on, in an eloquent vein, not the more businesslike tone he took with his announcement in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:33 am
The court in Himmelsetin v. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 7:08 am
The expected outcome in the case, considering United States v Windsor, is that the Commonwealth's ban will be declared unconstitutional.In announcing the policy reversal, AG Herring applauded the litigants even though as a state legislator, he voted for the ban. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 10:37 am
” That is what Edie Windsor imagined her late spouse, Thea Spyer, would have said after their love story brought down the core of the federal Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 4:51 am
As is often the case with 3-judge panels, one jurist stays poker-faced; this time, it was Bush appointee, Judge Jeffery Sutton.Since the SCOTUS decision in United States v Windsor, nearly every state's federal court system has cultivated a same-sex marriage case, usually challenging the constitutionality of a state law that bans or limits the rights of same-sex couples. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:05 am
Jackson filed her brief in United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
One of the most important changes came through the Supreme Court’s holding in United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:45 am
Perry (challenging California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 3:32 am
On the following day, March 27th, the Court will conduct hearings on the second case, United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 8:04 pm
(Dale Carpenter) The effect of United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:47 am
In a greatly anticipated and deeply divided opinion, the Supreme Court ruled yesterday that lawfully married same-sex couples are entitled to the equal protection of the laws pursuant to the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution and, thus, the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) must fall (United States v Windsor, June 26, 2013, Kennedy, A). [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 4:40 am
In light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 3:55 pm
In June 2013, in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 4:13 pm
United States, No. 1:10-cv-8435 (S.D.N.Y.) and Pedersen v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 2:40 pm
Windsor. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 10:04 pm
In a landmark decision, the United States Supreme Court held in U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:27 am
Supreme Court issued a major decision in U.S. v Windsor as Executor of the Estate of Spyer which can be read here. [read post]
