Search for: "Works v. State"
Results 401 - 420
of 61,586
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2014, 9:10 am
Superior Court may have a profound impact upon major public works projects throughout the state. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:59 pm
Bond v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 7:53 am
In Fischer v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 8:58 am
Reece v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 11:54 am
Newman v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 2:20 am
Her application for income support was refused by the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 1:15 pm
In Armindo v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:22 am
Chan v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 4:56 am
” Curtiss had cited Rausch v Pellegrini, 237 AD2d 771, in support of his “out of title” work argument. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 1:13 pm
Last week the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) issued its decision in Yee v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 11:00 am
Earlier this month, in Pritchett v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:00 pm
Additional Resources: State v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 3:53 pm
This month the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral arguments on Sandifer v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 12:24 pm
Talen Energy Marketing and CPV Maryland v. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 2:45 am
The State Immunity Act 1978, s 4(2)(b) and 16(1)(a) would not apply to the claims derived from EU law discrimination, harassment and breach of the Working Time Regulations. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 12:00 am
The decision was announced on August 2nd, affirming a district court’s grant of summary judgment in Save Jobs USA v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:42 pm
The Facts of Colwell v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 3:30 am
David Rubenstein’s recent article pushes us to view with a critical eye how these two doctrines work in concert to preempt swaths of state law, all without congressional action. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 3:38 am
He stated that though the Secretary of State failed to show how the Regulations comply with art 3(1), it is in the political, rather than the legal, arena that the consequences should be played out. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 3:00 am
However, Article 7(a) allowed member states to exclude the pensionable age from the scope of the Directive. [read post]
