Search for: "class Plaintiffs"
Results 401 - 420
of 34,448
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2012, 6:52 am
A February 2, 2012 decision by the Eighth Circuit upheld the use of stipulations by the named plaintiff and plaintiff’s counsel attempting to limit the amount in controversy to below the $5 million threshold for federal jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA). [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 9:31 am
We recently discussed Circuit Court rulings allowing nationwide class actions where the named plaintiffs could satisfy specific personal jurisdiction. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 3:29 pm
Nathan Koppel of the Wall Street Journal reports today on the guilty plea by leading class action plaintiff lawyer William Lerach to criminal conspiracy charges arising out of illegal kickbacks to plaintiffs in class action shareholder lawsuits. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 10:27 am
Plaintiff thus had not shown that absent class members suffered an injury-in-fact. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 12:07 pm
That opinion invited the plaintiffs, after the opportunity to take discovery, to move for class certification. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 6:32 am
Supreme made it more difficult for plaintiffs to prove standing when bringing a credit-reporting class action lawsuit. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 1:29 pm
A class action lawsuit is a lawsuit brought by a group of plaintiffs who have suffered similar […] The post Nissan Altima Hood Latch Class Action appeared first on California Consumer Attorneys, P.C.. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 7:54 pm
In September 2008, plaintiffs filed a motion requesting that the district court certify the litigation as a class action; however, in November 2009, plaintiffs withdrew their class action certification motion and “indicated an intent to withdraw class allegations. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 5:23 am
Interests of Plaintiffs in Class Action Conflicted with other Class Members, Warranting Certification of Subclass and new Hearing on Approval of Class Acton Settlement Second Circuit Holds Plaintiffs filed a class action Merck-Medco managed Case, L.L.C., a/k/a Medco Health Solutions, Inc., a pharmaceutical benefits manager (PBM), and its former parent company Merck & Co. [read post]
13 May 2014, 3:19 pm
Letona represented the plaintiffs and the class. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 4:35 am
Judicial Panel Grants Plaintiff Request for Pretrial Coordination of Class Action Lawsuits Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 5:00 am
” Plaintiffs want relief that duplicates a remedy that most buyers already have received, and that remains available to all members of the putative class. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:12 am
When a group of plaintiffs file a class action lawsuit, the class needs to be defined. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 6:15 am
Judge Kethledge’s decision finds that the class received “nearly worthless injunctive relief” while the named plaintiffs received $1,000 per child and the plaintiffs’ attorneys received $2.73 million. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 10:45 pm
Here are some blog posts from the week that was that might be of interest to class action practitioners: Class Action-Related Post of the Week Debbie Schlussel does not think too much of a class action settlement offering “victims” free makeup and perfume that the named plaintiffs’ claimed cosmetics companies cheated them out of in an alleged price-fixing [...] [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 7:27 am
The Ninth Circuit recently held that plaintiffs whose claims were tolled during the pendency of two class actions were not time-barred from bringing a third related putative class action when the first two classes were not certified. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 9:32 am
Plaintiff filed a state-law wage-and-hour class action in California state court on April 27, 2011. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:00 am
This case ultimately resulted in a $12 million judgment in favor of the plaintiff class, but that judgment was recently overturned by the First Circuit. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 7:53 pm
The Court's certification of the class will potentially increase the number of plaintiffs in the case, in that an additional larger group of past and present Enterprise employees will be notified of the case and advised of their right to "opt in" as plaintiffs in the case. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 4:51 am
In reaching its decision to deny the class certification motion, the Court found that plaintiffs failed to meet the adequacy requirement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a) because plaintiffs failed to demonstrate that the class representatives could adequately represent the class. [read post]
