Search for: "v. Atkins" Results 401 - 420 of 901
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2013, 9:28 am by Ron Coleman
That’s what Western District Judge Thomas Zilly found in his August 7 order on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment in Experience Hendrix, LLC v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 7:27 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
”  In 2002, the Court held in Atkins v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:41 am by Ron Coleman
All this is by way of linking to Michael Atkins’s recent post on the latest statement on the topic of that elusive “exceptional case,” this one on the other side of the continent, in a Ninth Circuit case called Haas Automation, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 10:39 pm by Jeff Gamso
  Tuesday, a panel of the 9th Circuit issued its opinion in Deere v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 11:35 am by Kali Borkoski
., chapter of the American Constitution Society will host a discussion of Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 10:04 am
The bill would override a notable 2009 court decision, Palmer/Sixth Street Properties, L.P. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 2:04 am by Peter Mahler
A recent decision by a Manhattan trial judge in Holdrum Investments, N.V. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
California Democrat David Atkins, who helped win this fight in California, pointed out in Digby’s Hullabaloo earlier this year, that he believes that the same tools can be used by Democrats everywhere. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 3:27 am by Stephen Page
To paraphrase Lord Atkin in United Australia v Barclays Bank[7], today, when the ghost of Mallet stands in the path of a just and equitable outcome, clanking its gender biased chains, the proper course for a judge is to pass through it undeterred. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 8:40 pm by Michael J.Z. Mannheimer
  This is in contrast to the persistent contrary view of Justices Scalia and Thomas, which can be summed up best by Justice Scalia’s comment in dissent in Atkins v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 11:07 am by Jeff Gamso
Virginia) and those who were under 18 at the time of their crime (Roper v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:18 am by Cormac Early
  He argues that “what Georgia — and other states — have done since” the Court’s decision in Atkins v. [read post]