Search for: "v. Cox" Results 401 - 420 of 1,839
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2018, 11:41 am by Welcome
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (COX, J.) [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 8:20 am by scanner1
Cox DA 15-0753 2018 MT 149N Criminal – Revocation Elliott and Mondul v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 8:17 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
Entre ellas se encuentra el Título V del Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (P.R.O.M.E.S.A.), que trata sobre la revitalización de la infraestructura de Puerto Rico. [read post]
31 May 2018, 12:00 pm by FM Librarian
"A Rapid Needs Assessment among the Rohingya and Host Communities in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh: A Randomized Survey," Open Science Framework, 15 April 2018- Preprint version of article.Gold Open Access [info]Articles, health-related:"Assessment of Oral Health and Cost of Care for a Group of Refugees in Germany: A Cross-sectional Study," BMC Oral Health, 18:69 (April 2018)"Asylum-seekers in Germany Differ from Regularly Insured in Their Morbidity, Utilizations… [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:13 am by Adam Feldman
For example, the majority and separate opinions in Jesner v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 6:17 am by Terry Hart
Cox incorrectly asserts that the cutoff date is the creation of the CLASSICS Act: Again, current copyright term in the United States is already too long, but CLASSICS would make this problem even worse. [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 1:40 pm by Eugene Volokh
Cox, 740 F.3d 1284, 1291 (9th Cir. 2014) (so holding in an Internet speech case). [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 11:29 pm by Kevin LaCroix
It may operate to exclude insurers’ liability for any claim brought against the board of directors for a failure in their duties against the company, unless there is a claw back of cover in the insured v insured exclusion itself. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 9:35 pm by Richard J. Pierce, Jr.
Supreme Court in February in Lucia v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 8:00 am by David Kris, Nate Jones
Bolton has also referred to federal campaign finance laws as an “overreact[ion]” to Watergate, and fought against them as counsel for the petitioners in Buckley v. [read post]