Search for: "v. Oliver" Results 401 - 420 of 1,994
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2012, 5:33 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Faidi & Anor v Elliot Corporation [2012] EWCA Civ 287 (16 March 2012) HK (Afghanistan) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 315 (16 March 2012) Yafai v Muthana [2012] EWCA Civ 289 (16 March 2012) McGuire v Rose [2012] EWCA Civ 288 (16 March 2012) Welsh Ministers & Anor v RWE Npower Renewables Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 311 (15 March 2012) Smith v Butler [2012] EWCA Civ 314 (15… [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
 An example of this use of the bad man thought experiment is provided in Justice Souter's opinion in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 9:30 am by Ilya Somin
The Third Circuit disagreed, however—if reluctantly—based on one sentence by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes in Missouri v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:56 am by Julie Lam
In lieu of granting leave to appeal in People v Oliver, No. 142895, the Michigan Supreme Court remanded the case to the Muskegon Circuit Court to enter an amended judgment of sentence granting the defendant sentencing credit for the period of time he was incarcerated as a condition of probation. [read post]
10 May 2015, 8:38 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 60688 (SD IL, May 8, 2015), an Illinois federal district court upheld $10,100 punitive damage verdict a jury had awarded against a prison chaplain who had denied a Moorish Science Temple member a vegan diet.In Oliver v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 5:00 am by Howard Friedman
 The religion is currently recognized.In Oliver v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 9:31 pm
TITLE: Three Generations, No Imbeciles SUBTITLE: Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 12:14 pm
Oliver Wendell Holmes, photographed in 1900, served 30 years on the U.S. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 8:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
"   Today, that decision was recalled and this is the final outcome: "The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of DiGiovanna's motion which was to dismiss the cause of action to recover damages for breach of contract insofar as asserted against him, as that cause of action was duplicative of the legal malpractice cause of action (see Maiolini v McAdams & Fallon, P.C., 61 AD3d 644, 645; Gelfand v Oliver, 29 AD3d 736; Shivers v Siegel,… [read post]