Search for: "Bui v. State" Results 4181 - 4200 of 9,822
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2015, 5:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Was there a preexisting relationship—complete strangers, bad breakup, make or buy decision that went bad? [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:43 am by James Kachmar
Turning to the issue of likelihood of consumer confusion, the Ninth Circuit stated that it had to use the factors from AMF, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Coca-Cola’s treatment in Canada v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 4:25 am by David DePaolo
I frankly am surprised this issue hasn't been decided yet: Whether a foreign truck driver working for a foreign trucking firm who gets injured while driving a foreign truck on United States territory can be the subject of a state workers' compensation scheme if the driver had already availed himself of the foreign system.But, apparently that issue has never been addressed - at least not by the United States Supreme Court.SCOTUS docketed for review the case… [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 11:27 am
Jan. 23, 2015) – and Florida state court – Buccelli v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
The proper analysis, the majority urges, is that courts should distinguish works based on “whether a likely purchaser’s primary motivation is to buy a reproduction of the celebrity, or to buy the expressive work of that artist. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 6:00 am by Nola Werren, Esq.
This concept was addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Buckley v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 2:08 pm
Indeed, this is how the Warren Court treated the unenumerated “right to privacy” it first recognized in Griswold v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 1:20 pm by Joe Koncelik
 Buying a Business is the Perfect Time to Perform an Environmental Audit? [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 5:54 am by @travelblawg
Unfortunately for good taste, though, people should be allowed to buy shot glasses depicting those things. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 1:27 am by John Enser
: Europe’s creative output is one of its richest resources, and those who want to enjoy it should be able to pay to do so, even when it is only sold in another Member State [but not, apparently, if it is supplied other than for sale? [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:09 pm
Lawmakers’ content- or viewpoint-based intentions generally don’t invalidate facially content-neutral speech-restrictive laws, see United States v. [read post]
In a pair of memorandum opinions written by Vice Chancellor Glasscock and decided on January 5, 2015, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, in In Re Appraisal of Ancestry.com, Inc. and Merion Capital LP v. [read post]