Search for: "Burden v. Burden"
Results 4181 - 4200
of 30,987
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2023, 7:35 am
Additional Resources: State Farm v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 3:09 am
In a more recent case, Betty Bossi Verlag AG v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:43 pm
Windham Builders, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 1:03 pm
Facts of the Case In the recent case of Johnson v. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 1:03 pm
Facts of the Case In the recent case of Johnson v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 6:23 am
Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 10:49 am
Williams v. [read post]
30 Oct 2024, 7:15 am
Once the prima facie showing of willful violation is made, the burden shifts to the non-compliant parent to provide evidence justifying their failure to pay support. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:09 pm
The Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision overruling its long-standing physical presence rule in South Dakota v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:26 pm
Matthew Edge won in State v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 7:24 am
The Massachusetts Appeals Court recently decided a case addressing the mechanics of such a provision in Patriot Power, LLC v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 7:24 am
The Massachusetts Appeals Court recently decided a case addressing the mechanics of such a provision in Patriot Power, LLC v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 7:24 am
The Massachusetts Appeals Court recently decided a case addressing the mechanics of such a provision in Patriot Power, LLC v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 12:47 pm
Twombly and Ashcroft v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 1:23 pm
Twombly and Ashcroft v. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 11:42 am
In Nielson v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 1:21 am
Lord Neuberger similarly stated that courts should “bear clearly in mind” the need to interpret the duty in a way which does not impose an impossible or disproportionate burden on the police. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:14 pm
At a hearing on a motion pursuant to CPL 440.10, the defendant has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence every fact essential to support the motion in accordance with C.P.L. 440.30(6) and as was held in People v Tucker, involving a motion to vacate a judgment of conviction based on new evidence pursuant to C.P.L 440.10(1)(g) and People v Tankleff. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 9:29 am
Let's get started again: In Ritenour v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 7:27 am
Age discrimination lawsuit dismissed after applicant failed to show employer's reason for rejection were pretext to mask acts of unlawful discriminationSaia v Suffolk County Community Coll., 2009 NY Slip Op 05851, decided on July 14, 2009, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentRobert Saia sued the Suffolk County Community College in an attempt to obtain damages. [read post]
