Search for: "C/T"
Results 4181 - 4200
of 50,101
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2006, 2:07 pm
§ 2255, he can't use 2255 again. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 11:29 pm
Doesn't C-32 create exceptions that mean "anything goes"? [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 1:00 am
However, as the Board of Appeal (3.2.05) in T 1299/15 confirmed, it is possible for the burden of proof to shift back to the patentee if "serious doubts" exist regarding whether a skilled person could carry out the invention: Burden of Proof was Shifting the burden of proof back to the patentee (T 1299/15).Exceptions to patentabilityPerfect teethMethods of surgery are excluded from patentability under Article 53(c) EPC. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 6:25 pm
Chris Dodd- C-: He behaved a lot like Biden but didn’t have the the same understated charm. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 6:56 am
That’s my “C” word in the bankruptcy alphabet. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 11:57 am
Second, these infections aren't just hospital-acquired, or nosocomial, anymore. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:52 am
(2) hypothesis: causation is important and underthought at this stage b/c modern TM lacks a materiality requirement in the first place, which it should have preserved from the old common law. (3) Also, be interested to have you speak to relationship b/t irreparable harm and difficulty calculating damages—does showing that it’s really hard to trace damages support the pre-eBay practice of having injunctive relief be standard? [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 11:11 am
The FCC Bureau argued that while AT&T should be afforded some protection under §522(b)(4), the exemptions afforded under §522(b)(7)(C) should not be granted to AT&T because a corporation is not considered a person and therefore should not be conferred a benefit it is not owed. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 8:20 am
The high -wered counsel they have now employed do bill by the hour and don't come cheaply. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 12:26 am
Legal basis for this requirement, the Board noted, could be found in T 488/16 (r. 4.2), T 1329/04 (r. 12), and T 433/05 (r.28). [read post]
Suffolk University Law School IP Center, Fourth Annual Intellectual Property & Innovation Conference
30 Sep 2022, 8:21 am
After 2018 farm bill defining hemp as distinct from marijuana: Appropriate identification w/correct wording can allow hemp goods, but FDCA refusal may still apply even if Controlled Substances Act doesn’t apply b/c hemp can’t be turned to CBD for ingestible/medicinal/therapeutic use—but huge spike in CBD-related applications occurred as a result of 2018 change. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 1:49 pm
We didn’t recommend gov’t designation process or repealing 512(i) entirely. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 2:12 pm
That Court annulled the decision in its judgment in Joined Cases T- 50/06, T-56/06, T-62/06 and T-69/06 Ireland and others v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 7:18 am
This is an interesting 512(c) ruling for at least reasons: * I can’t recall another 512(c) case where a corporation was the “user” who directed the defendant to store the material. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 12:28 am
C. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 6:47 am
"The new offense is a Class C misdemeanor. and only bans phone use while the car is in motion; you can still punch in numbers at a stoplight or while stuck in traffic and put the phone on speaker. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:36 am
If you change the letters in NATO to M E X I C O you get Mexico. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 10:00 pm
Another step many people don't always think about is saving clothing and shoes from the incident. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 6:31 am
§ 1447(c), remand is available if the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 10:47 am
” The survey didn’t even ask about Imprimis’s specific product. [read post]
