Search for: "Germany v. Germany"
Results 4181 - 4200
of 4,535
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2009, 2:55 am
There was no suggestion in submissions that the place of contract was, for example, Germany. [read post]
20 May 2009, 6:43 am
When I described the holdings of Iqbal and Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 11:15 am
Brissett v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 10:46 pm
Thanks to everyone who came to “Meet the Bloggers V” tonight at Graham & Dunn on Seattle’s beautiful waterfront. [read post]
18 May 2009, 11:29 am
In Van Devent v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
17 May 2009, 9:03 pm
May 18-21, 2009 - BIO International Convention (Biotechnology Industry Organization) - Atlanta, GA May 20, 2009 - Tafas v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 2:18 pm
In its judgment in Case C-531/07 Fachverband der Buch- und Medienwirtschaft v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 10:27 am
This allows valid floating charges on the assets of UK companies based in Germany. [read post]
10 May 2009, 8:45 pm
May 18-21, 2009 - BIO International Convention (Biotechnology Industry Organization) - Atlanta, GA May 20, 2009 - Tafas v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 9:00 am
Canada US targets Canada over copyright in Special 301 Report (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) (At Last... the 1709 Copyright Blog) (Michael Geist) Federal Court awards $250,000 to Microsoft over sale of two computers with unauthorised copies of Microsoft software: Microsoft v PC Village et al (Excess Copyright) CIRA: Complaint dismissed, costs awarded against… [read post]
8 May 2009, 8:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Mircera (Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta) – US: Federal Circuit revises Amgen v ITC (Patently-O) (Patent Baristas) (ITC 337 Law Blog) (Hal Wegner) (Patent Docs) General Alicia Greenidge to step down as Director of IFPMA (Intellectual Property Watch) Flu crisis could lead to compulsory licences (Managing… [read post]
7 May 2009, 12:22 pm
In Van Devent v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 1:16 pm
The application in Demjanjuk v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 8:20 am
FloraPrima GmbH v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 6:21 pm
Delaware Amends Corporations Code to Address Indemnification and Advancement Concern: As I noted in an earlier post (here), in a March 2008 decision in the Schoon v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 8:49 pm
May 18-21, 2009 - BIO International Convention (Biotechnology Industry Organization) - Atlanta, GA May 20, 2009 - Tafas v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
(IPEG) EU gives go ahead for Canada trade talks (Michael Geist) Europe not represented among the world’s most innovative cities according to Business Week survey (Innovationpartners) EPO Applicant Panel Survey 2008 results published (BLOG@IP::JUR) Germany Chinese company Wangzhihe reclaims brand in Germany (Managing Intellectual Property) Hong Kong Hong Kong proposes copyright quotas (Managing Intellectual Property) Hungary Metropolitan… [read post]
1 May 2009, 10:00 am
(Creative Commons) Copyright Office hearing on proposed exemptions to DMCA ban on DRM circumvention (EFF) (Ars Technica) Open educational resources and implementation of the US Recovery Act (Creative Commons) Twitter and the DMCA: A fine mess (The Trademark Blog) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Apple – Apple sued by BluWiki operator OdioWorks, seeking declaratory judgment that its postings do not violate DMCA (Ars Technica) (EFF) Google – District… [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 2:08 pm
Guggenheim Museum over other Holocaust-era artwork, in Schoeps v. [read post]
