Search for: "HARDING v. HAND"
Results 4181 - 4200
of 6,600
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2012, 10:00 am
., P.A. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:54 am
But this first possibility seems to me unlikely given the Court’s more recent tendency to announce, and then apply in the case at hand, rigorous tests in the affirmative action realm, as exemplified by Justice Kennedy’s own majority opinion in Ricci v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 10:55 pm
” There are relevant precedents by US courts, such as Vernor v Autodesk and MDY v Blizzard, in which it was held that the grant of a licence is not tantamount to a transfer of ownership. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 3:56 am
On the 1709 Blog Iona Harding looks at a little spat over The Godfather and asks: "Can you copyright a film character? [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:49 pm
Because of this an a ruling that was handed down by the SJC in the past couple of years (Commonwealth v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 1:19 pm
Embody v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 1:19 pm
Embody v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 4:45 am
Flax Managing Director, Litigation ConsultingA2L Consulting In last week’s article on the conclusion of the Apple v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am
Bill BuxtonMicrosoft ResearchOriginal: Jan. 12, 2007Version: March 2, 2012 Keywords / Search Terms Multi-touch, multitouch, input, interaction, touch screen, touch tablet, multi-finger input, multi-hand input, bi-manual input, two-handed input, multi-person input, interactive surfaces, soft machine, hand gesture, gesture recognition . [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm
[Week commencing 13 August] Full Fact v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 17/08/2012; Joseph Horner v The Observer, Clause 1, 16/08/2012; Mr Christopher Mackin v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Jane Hughes v The Independent on Sunday, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Dr Yannis Alexandrides v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Alex Jarvis v Daily Mail, Clauses 3, 5, 15/08/2012; Inspired Thinking Group… [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 2:13 pm
Guest post by Andrei Mincov (Mincov Law Corporation) And so, round one of Apple v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 3:20 am
In State v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:31 pm
During conference a handful of the Justices suggested the OSG weigh in. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:14 pm
(Orin Kerr) Today in United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 5:33 pm
I am hard-pressed as to know how to think about patents otherwise. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 9:29 pm
But on the narrow issue of conservative v. something else--well, kudos to Mark for trying. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 9:02 am
The all-time points leader in this hard-contested competition – which Merpel has just now invented – is Lord Hoffman for that unbeatable one-two combination in Improver v Remington which has had trainee patent attorneys reaching for their dictionaries for over two decades: “the patentee was intending the word or phrase to have not a literal but a figurative meaning (the figure being a form of synecdoche or metonymy)”.] [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 12:46 pm
In Peters v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 12:39 pm
Sherman v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 12:39 pm
Sherman v. [read post]
