Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 4181 - 4200
of 4,275
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2007, 4:57 am
Plaintiff cross-moved for summary judgment, arguing that the tenant is a British citizen who entered the United States on a B-2 tourist visa, and is thus statutorily barred from maintaining a permanent residence in the United States. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 6:53 am
The purpose of this Convention is "to notify to other States where a launching State's space objects are located in order to prevent collision" and to make "identifiable the potentially liable launching State for damage cause by a space object. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 7:27 am
"); United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 5:38 pm
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit announced in Broadcom Corp. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 11:20 am
The Parties The Complainant is Facebook Inc. of Palo Alto, California, the United States of America, represented by Heller Ehrman LLP, the United States of America. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 9:11 am
Arizona Cartridge Remanufacturers Association Inc. v Lexmark International Inc, 421 F.3d 981 (9th Cir. 2005) United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 7:16 am
Allocated v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:01 am
Glenn Sulmasy, JAG and law professor at the US Coast Guard academy, and John Yoo have published a new article in the UCLA law review, "Challenges to Civilian Control of the Military: A Rational Choice Approach to the War on Terror," 54 UCLALR 1815 (August 2007). [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:49 am
Last week I noted the story and decision of City of Springfield Code Enforcement v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 8:29 pm
United States, 115 Wn.2d 52, 793 P.2d 969, 800 P.2d 1124 (1990). [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 8:29 pm
United States, 115 Wn.2d 52, 793 P.2d 969, 800 P.2d 1124 (1990). [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 1:29 pm
In Tiseo Architects, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 2:27 am
The case, entitled National Surety Corporation v. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 1:56 am
"
Federal Decisions:
United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 10:44 am
The Court held that the Brulotte decision was limited to only those “patent rights in the United States, . . . [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 10:20 pm
In Warshak v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 7:39 am
Courts routinely find that the attorney-client privilege must not only be asserted, but supported, on a document-by-document basis and that, if the privilege-holder fails to support each of the required elements for maintaining privilege, privilege claims should not be sustained. [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 1:22 pm
Enron Corp. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 2:20 pm
Qualcomm Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 1:54 am
” All rights in preferred stock provisions, even if considered standard or customary, must be “expressly and clearly stated. [read post]
