Search for: "House v. State"
Results 4181 - 4200
of 25,367
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
Gonzalez v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 2:48 pm
That's the question the United States Supreme Court considered on Monday in the case of Rubin v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 9:20 am
While we know from Reno v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 10:52 am
Further, applying RR v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2019] UKSC 52 it was possible to disapply the discriminatory parts of the regulations to give JA a remedy without her needing to make a separate human rights claim. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:07 pm
Utah Power & Light Co. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 11:13 am
Zaman v Waltham Forest LBC Waltham had accepted that it owed Ms Zaman the full housing duty in October 2020. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 1:13 pm
in Congress, then perhaps one might look to the Constitution for an explanation: The fact that every single member of Congress is elected from a defined geographical area and subject, in the case of members of the House, to election every two years, guarantees that "rational" members of Congress will put the interests of their constituents, who will enable their re-election, ahead of evanescent interests of "the country. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 7:55 am
State v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 4:10 am
State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Survivors often suffer long term economic consequences, including poor credit, housing issues, and few to no assets. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 8:02 pm
See United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 8:21 pm
Murr v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:48 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:40 am
State v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 10:04 am
After Lingle v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 12:30 pm
The issue in Florence v. [read post]
Symposium: The Supreme Court recognizes but limits disparate impact in its Fair Housing Act decision
26 Jun 2015, 5:58 am
On June 25, 2015, the Supreme Court, by a five-to-four margin, upheld the application of disparate impact under the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”) in Texas Department of Housing & Community Affairs v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:55 am
United States of America v Tuggle – did establishing three CCTV cameras, encircling a man’s house for 18 months violate his privacy rights per the Fourth Amendment? [read post]
28 May 2014, 12:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 1:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
