Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10" Results 4181 - 4200 of 5,514
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2020, 8:52 am by Bryn Miller
 At the state level, map-drawers must meet strict transparency and public engagement requirements throughout the process.1  To promote public participation during the last redistricting cycle, the state Redistricting Commission held more than 70 business meetings and 34 public hearings in 32 cities throughout the state.2  For county supervisor districts, multiple hearings are required at different stages of the redistricting process, with requirements as to timing, public… [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 6:00 am by Steven Peck
Schwartz was the successor trustee of the Trust dated November 10, 1995, and amended and restated in January 2003.[ 5 ] The Lawsons acquired the Santa Barbara residence (the Santa Barbara property) in 1990. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 11:51 pm
Although revenues could have reached the $1 billion milestone with a mild rise, they instead dipped by 3.8 percent, to $942 million. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 9:52 am
§ 31-14-17-1 does not violate the Equal Protection Clause or the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 9:54 am
Zietlow, The Judicial Restraint of the Warren Court (and Why it Matters), Ohio State Law Journal, Volume 69, Issue 2. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 2:58 pm
Last week, the Ninth Circuit in Perfect 10 v. [read post]
19 Nov 2024, 11:58 am by Michael Lowe
  The argument was that the mother’s 911 call was evidence improperly withheld in violation of Article 39.14 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, along with violating assorted constitutional protections (i.e., Sixth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution; Article 1, sec. 10 and 19 of the Texas Constitution). [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 7:38 pm by Mathew O'Neill
As a practical matter, amending the Constitution to change the Electoral College seems unattainable. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:00 am by Kara OBrien
§ 1818), which permits “the appropriate Federal banking agency” to bring enforcement actions against banks that are “violating or [have] violated, or … [are] about to violate, a law, rule or regulation. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 6:26 am
Endnotes [1] The plaintiffs described a three-way circuit split in the application of the “conduct test. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Mishcon de Reya Data Matters had a post “ICO Opinion on live facial recognition”. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am by Wolfgang Demino
 The defendants contend that Madden's claims fail as a matter of law for two reasons: (1) state-law usury claims and FDCPA claims predicated on state-law violations against a national bank's assignees, such as the defendants here, are preempted by the National Bank Act ("NBA"), and (2) the agreement governing Madden's debt requires the application of Delaware law, under which the interest charged is permissible.The District Court entered judgment for… [read post]