Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 4181 - 4200 of 21,100
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2020, 3:17 pm by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
The plaintiff’s lawsuit against the device manufacturer claimed that the manufacturer was liable for the product’s design defect, failure to warn, and negligence. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 4:29 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
The patient’s daughter (plaintiff) filed a healthcare liability suit against the pharmacy defendants, Dr. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 3:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
  That Defendant was the advocacy alliance which was allegedly authorized by the Social Security Administration Act as the resident’s payee for Social Security benefits and manage the same for the resident. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:19 pm by RHP
The argument of the plaintiff was straightforward: the defendants dog was unleashed in the defendants unfenced front yard, and the dog charged the plaintiff (and her dog) causing her startle and fall. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 2:02 pm
Rather, what the plaintiff gained from the contract was the defendants services. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 8:23 am by Léon Dijkman
The decision is interesting because of (1) the Court's analysis of the interface between paediatric extensions, orphan drugs and SPC's; (2) the Court's finding that the holder of a market authorization (MA) and a parent company can be liable for tortious interference of patent infringement; and (3) the Court's assumption of jurisdiction to impose cross-border relief against a foreign MA holder. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 5:01 am by William Ford
They submit that Hifter is liable for these crimes. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 2:21 pm by Ilya Somin
The thief himself may be liable (if you can find him!). [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 10:45 am by Cindy Cohn
The ATS allows noncitizens to bring a civil claim in U.S. federal court against a defendant that violated human rights laws. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm by Lorenzo d’Aubert, Eric Halliday
Barrett argued that a textual analysis of the 1996 amendments justified the focus on self-sufficiency because those changes added a requirement for family-sponsored applicants to produce an enforceable affidavit of support from a sponsor, rendering the sponsor potentially liable for any means-tested benefit received by the noncitizen applicant. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 10:01 am by Alan Z. Rozenshtein
Either way, any decision by the Supreme Court would create enormous uncertainty among lower courts, which would—at least under Thomas’s preferred reading of Section 230—have to figure out under what circumstances platforms should be held liable for knowingly distributing false, harmful or illegal content. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 8:17 am by Eric Goldman
The statement criticizes Section 230’s application to claims involving “alleged product design flaws—that is, the defendants own misconduct. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 5:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “In Plaintiff’s first claim for legal malpractice, she alleges that Defendants deviated from good and accepted practice by failing to file a motion for summary judgment. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:43 am by Brett Raffish
Monroe County, the Supreme Court held that Alabama sheriff-defendants represented the state as a whole, not their individual counties, when executing their law enforcement duties. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:43 am by Steve Lubet
As a law professor and civil libertarian, I think that the “material support” precedents sweep far too broadly and are liable to misuse. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 7:57 am by Eric Goldman
The court wonders if Pixels has disqualifying “right and ability to control,” which the Veoh case defined as when the defendant “exert[s] substantial influence on the activities of users. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 7:06 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
 In this case, defendants failure to plead comparative fault and then subsequent testimony that the nurse did not fully inform him of the patient’s condition led to a jury verdict in his favor being vacated and a second trial where he was found to be liable. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:19 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
A jury found the defendants liable on the unfair competition contention but ruled in favor of the defendants on the other three theories. [read post]