Search for: "Mays v. State"
Results 4181 - 4200
of 119,029
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
Holland, Simpson Thacher and Bartlett LLP, on Saturday, May 27, 2023 Tags: anti-ESG, Financial institutions, Institutional Investors, legislation, Monetary policy, State regulation Significant Amendments to Private Fund Adviser Reporting on Form PF Posted by Diane Blizzard and Radhika Kshatriya, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, on Sunday, May 28, 2023 Tags: Disclosure, Form PF, Investment advisers, Private equity, Private funds, SEC enforcement The Imperfect CEO Posted by… [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
Holland, Simpson Thacher and Bartlett LLP, on Saturday, May 27, 2023 Tags: anti-ESG, Financial institutions, Institutional Investors, legislation, Monetary policy, State regulation Significant Amendments to Private Fund Adviser Reporting on Form PF Posted by Diane Blizzard and Radhika Kshatriya, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, on Sunday, May 28, 2023 Tags: Disclosure, Form PF, Investment advisers, Private equity, Private funds, SEC enforcement The Imperfect CEO Posted by… [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 5:30 am
Miranda v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 8:38 am
We may get more insights imminently from the Missouri v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:39 am
No private right of action against “state actors” pursuant to 42 USC 1981, the Civil Rights LawMcGovern v Philadelphia, USCA Third Circuit, No. 08-1632, Decided January 28, 2009The McGovern decision holds that employees of a municipality may not sue the City of Philadelphia pursuant to 42 USC 1981 for alleged race discrimination.Paul McGovern, a Caucasian male, was employed by the City of Philadelphia.On September 25, 2003, McGovern filed a complaint of race… [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
No private right of action against "state actors" pursuant to 42 USC 1981, the Civil Rights LawMcGovern v Philadelphia, USCA Third Circuit, No. 08-1632, Decided January 28, 2009The McGovern decision holds that employees of a municipality may not sue the City of Philadelphia pursuant to 42 USC 1981 for alleged race discrimination.Paul McGovern, a Caucasian male, was employed by the City of Philadelphia. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 6:22 am
In Baanyan Software Services Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 9:15 pm
Per OneSimpleLoan v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 3:04 am
R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State (No.2) [2011] EWCA Civ 639 is one that we may have missed when it first came out (or we decided not to do it – we can’t quite remember now), but, given that I have some free time this morning, I thought I’d do a short note on it. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 7:44 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 12:20 pm
[JURIST] The California Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF; Perry v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 12:40 pm
(May 17, 2020 at 3:01 am); available at: https://www.statesman.com/opinion/20200517/its-debatable-can-state-restrict-concealed-carry-rights-of-non-residents. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 10:40 am
The United States Supreme Court recently announced that it will hear oral arguments on Missouri v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 5:09 pm
Continuing in catch up mode, On Monday The Supreme Court agreed to hear District Attorney's Office v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 5:55 am
State v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 5:43 am
More recently, in Hassen v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:07 am
Hajec is Director of Litigation at the Immigration Reform Law Institute, which filed an amicus brief in support of the administration in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 10:00 pm
It is the federal district court matter of United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
An employer may, but is not required to, create a new job or create a light-duty version of the disabled employee’s current job in order to provide a reasonable accommodation Jacobsen v New York City Health & Hosps. [read post]
