Search for: "PAGE v. UNITED STATES" Results 4181 - 4200 of 9,964
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2015, 1:35 pm by Michael Knapp
United States, or its decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 8:36 am by Lisa McElroy
  As it turns out, he is called to a different kind of service – as a clerk at the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 7:09 am by becassidy
The media frenzy so tainted his case that the United States Supreme Court released him and ordered a retrial in the decision Sheppard v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 5:38 am by SHG
   The Supreme Court of the United States is the final arbitrator of constitutionality. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 4:30 am by Niamh Quille, Leigh Day
(ii) Does such a person in any event remain subject to the legislation of the UK in the light of Point 19(c) of the United Kingdom’s annex VI to the Regulation? [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 12:38 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
Remember Division 30, you know, the group of Syrian rebels trained by the United States as the ground force to defeat ISIS? [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 1:42 pm
Defendant’s Twitter account, Todd Levitt 2.0, is a parody that is protected under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 12:31 am by Stephen Page
It seems to me that is not the most desirable state of affairs. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 8:46 am by Victoria Kwan
Sotomayor later left the contiguous United States for Puerto Rico, where she spoke to judges from eight Latin American countries on September 17 as part of a training program organized by the State Department’s Judicial Studies Institute. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
One of the justifications for a local final appellate court was that it would enhance access to justice as litigants would not have to bear the costs of travel to the United Kingdom. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 6:30 am by Margaret Wood
  Footnote 1 on page three of the Literal Print of the Amendments provides important information as to what the dates of ratification were understood to be:  “In Dillon v. [read post]