Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 4181 - 4200
of 6,183
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2012, 6:27 am
The drafter has been a little coy about this balance, preferring to repeat the balance and observe: "The Secretary of State would encourage authorities to consider the scope to take advantage of this flexibility to meet local needs and local priorities" (para 4.26). [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:27 am
The drafter has been a little coy about this balance, preferring to repeat the balance and observe: "The Secretary of State would encourage authorities to consider the scope to take advantage of this flexibility to meet local needs and local priorities" (para 4.26). [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 4:49 am
The Northern Ireland Act 1998 has therefore never really been regarded as something that can/should sustain a legally sovereign legislature, even if the Act has been described as a “constitutional statute” (see Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland [2002] UKHL 32). [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:09 am
Two years later, in CCH Canadian Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 2:33 pm
Gore (de 1996) y luego en State Farm v. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 9:02 pm
CA2005-08074, 2006 Ohio 1784, at ¶19, quoting State v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 8:23 am
The case is The Episcopal Diocese of Fort Worth, et al. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 7:15 am
R.L.U., 2004 BCSC 95, at para. 40; Creber v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:08 pm
In Mosley at para 229 Eady J directed himself to take into account awards in defamation cases, and referred also to Gleaner Company Ltd v Abrahams [2004] 1 AC 628. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 3:01 pm
DB Investments, Inc., 2011-2 Trade Cases ¶77,736. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 6:03 am
v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 3:59 am
In paras 33 to 35 it was observed as under:- “33. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:15 am
Alonzo v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 9:01 pm
State v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 11:04 am
” (paras. 19, 21-2). [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 1:50 am
[para 69] The Court of Appeal concluded that those of the appellant’s statements which he tried to refute could not be discounted as an unrepresentative sample of his utterances. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 1:04 am
” (para 94). [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 1:45 pm
"The decision is NBT Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 5:53 am
State v. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
The Constitution Bench of this Court in Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia and Others v. [read post]
