Search for: "People v. Polite"
Results 4181 - 4200
of 13,782
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2020, 3:49 am
New Zealand On 3 April 2020 Palmer J handed down judgment in the case of Stringer v Craig [2020] NZHC 644, a libel claim brought by a former Conservative Party member against the former leader of the party and a number of those involved in the publication of a booklet accusing him of being engaged in dirty politics. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:21 am
Because defendant is being prosecuted on the basis of false speech, rather than speech involving subversive political advocacy or speech designed to incite a riot (compare Penal Law § 240.08; People v Upshaw, 190 Misc 2d 704, 706-709 [NY City Crim Ct 2002]), Brandenburg and its progeny do not apply (compare United States v Alvarez, 567 US 709, 722 [2012]; see generally Tom Hentoff, Note, Speech, Harm, and Self-Government: Understanding the Ambit of the Clear… [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
Thus, twenty years ago, in Bush v. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 6:10 pm
Supreme Court in New York Times v. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 3:12 am
”Hong KongHKSAR v. [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 5:03 am
Last Thursday, New York's intermediate appellate court in People v. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 1:28 pm
The agents are usually polite and professional, and this tactic frequently gets law enforcement access to all sorts of information because they know people want to be cooperative and help law enforcement. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 1:16 pm
Courts Politicized, Justice Preverted Partisan politics were on display on April 6, 2020 in a per curiam decision, Republican National Committee. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 3:04 am
In Milirrpum v Nabalco Pty Ltd (1971) 17 FLR 141, 267, for example, Blackburn J said: The evidence shows a subtle and elaborate system highly adapted to the country in which the people led their lives, which provided a stable order of society and was remarkably free from the vagaries of personal whim or influence. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 11:18 am
Arguing that a book is obscene helps evade First Amendment challenges, like the one at the center of Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 10:49 am
Based on ample precedent — including a landmark 2018 case that the ACLU won in the Supreme Court, Carpenter v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 1:20 pm
Naffe v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 4:13 am
A shift in the political landscape: where now for the rule of law? [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 9:09 pm
Takushi (1992) and Anderson v. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 10:32 pm
Last week the Munich I Regional Court's press office confirmed to me that the Nokia v. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 4:47 pm
Forbes had a piece “Zoom Alternatives: 5 Options For People Who Care About Security And Privacy”. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 2:35 pm
Valeska V. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:49 pm
So the dilemma facing contemporary liberals (and liberalism) is to enunciate a "progressive" political program at the same time that most liberals are scared stiff of what is described as "populism," i.e., a much more active participation by "we the people" in the process of decisionmaking and a concomitant distrust of established elites. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:58 pm
Delaware’s Weird—and Constitutionally Suspect—Approach to Judicial Independence By Garrett Epps, Professor of Law, University of Baltimore School of Law Garrett Epps discusses an upcoming Supreme Court case, Carney v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:00 am
Part V addresses three arguments against universal mask wearing. [read post]
