Search for: "Perry"
Results 4181 - 4200
of 12,156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2013, 12:55 pm
the outcome in Shelby County, public reaction to which has been muted by Windsor and Perry. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:35 pm
If that were not enough, the Supreme Court’s companion decision, Hollingsworth v Perry, No. 12-144, decided June 26, 2013, leaves in place a determination, under California state law, that same-sex partners could not be denied the benefits of marriage. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:32 pm
If that were not enough, the Supreme Court’s companion decision, Hollingsworth v Perry, No. 12-144, decided June 26, 2013, leaves in place a determination, under California state law, that same-sex partners could not be denied the benefits of marriage. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:11 pm
Perry, In-House Counsel, In-house counseling, Law Clerks, Pro Bono, Prop 8, Proposition 8, SCOTUS, Supreme Court [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:24 am
Perry – joined by the unlikely coalition of Justices Scalia, Ginsburg, Breyer, and Kagan – that the private group seeking to appeal from the district court’s invalidation of California’s Prop 8 lacked standing to do so, while anything but legally obvious, was at least defensible – and again quite predictable. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:08 am
So, I had to smile at this line from his Perry dissent -- "Those errors necessitate this respectful dissent" -- and this one: "These are the premises for this respectful dissent." [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:01 am
Perry, says: We have never before upheld the standing of a private party to defend the constitutionality of a state statute when state officials have chosen not to. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 10:12 am
So, the same-sex marriage cases came out as they were widely predicted to do -- the Court struck down DOMA and punted on the larger question of whether there is a constitutional right to same sex marriage. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 9:52 am
Perry (California's Proposition 8)In the second case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:52 am
Perry, PDF, the Prop 8 case, written by the Chief Justice. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:50 am
We congratulate the Perry team on their incredible achievement – persuading the Court to allow California to become the 13th state (and the District of Columbia) to embrace marriage for everyone. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:37 am
All it has to do is to cite the US Supreme Court's decision today in Perry and affirm the Delhi High Court's decision:We have never before upheld the standing of a private party to defend the constitutionality of a state statute when state officials have chosen not to. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:34 am
Perry – affirming lower court decision striking down Cal. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:24 am
You also have the situation in Perry itself. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:19 am
Perry, a challenge to California’s controversial Proposition 8 measure, and a case out of New York, U.S. v Windsor, which considers the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:10 am
The argument for standing is actually stronger in Perry, where the Court (with a strange lineup of Justices) said that there was no standing. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:03 am
Perry. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:48 am
The Court decided both cases presenting the issue of the constitutionality of bans on same-sex marriage. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:41 am
Perry, John G. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:34 am
Perry (formerly Perry v. [read post]
