Search for: "Reproductive Rights" Results 4181 - 4200 of 8,487
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2016, 6:27 am by David Markus
But it’s still terrifying in a Supreme Court term in which both reproductive rights and statutorily guaranteed birth control are on the docket. [read post]
22 May 2016, 11:54 pm by Jeff Margulies (US)
As these changes largely seek to clarify existing language in the proposed regulations since the prior revision in March, we have a pretty good idea of what the final regulations will look like (although OEHHA does reserve the right to make additional changes). [read post]
20 May 2016, 12:12 pm
Although this decision does not go as far as Kamakahi in protecting the rights of egg donors, it is certainly a step in the right direction. [read post]
20 May 2016, 12:12 pm
Although this decision does not go as far as Kamakahi in protecting the rights of egg donors, it is certainly a step in the right direction. [read post]
20 May 2016, 8:53 am by Howard Wasserman
This Slate story and this letter from the Center for Reproductive Rights describes the controversy in what I would argue are the appropriate departmentalist terms. [read post]
20 May 2016, 7:20 am by Amy Howe
EEOC, in which the Court ruled that a favorable ruling on the merits is not a necessary predicate to find that a defendant is a prevailing party for purposes of an award of attorney’s fees under Section 706 of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
20 May 2016, 5:58 am by Staci Zaretsky
Per the Center for Reproductive Rights, the proposed law is "harmful, discriminatory, clearly unconstitutional, and insulting to Oklahoma women and their families. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:06 am by Leslie Griffin
The goal of the religious non-profits from the start of this litigation was complete exemption from the reproductive health care benefit. [read post]
16 May 2016, 12:11 pm by Kate Mataya
Gestational mothers have two important and clearly defined rights in Texas: health rights: a gestational agreement may not limit the right of the gestational mother to make decisions to safe-guard her health or the health of an embryo (see Tex. [read post]
14 May 2016, 8:54 am by Mark Tushnet
If that hypothesis is correct, though, progressives might be a position to achieve our rights-protective goals through legislation – a national statute against anti-LGBT discrimination, for example, or a national statute protecting the right to choose with respect to reproduction. [read post]
13 May 2016, 1:37 pm by Jeremy Malcolm
For example, the paper frankly acknowledges that the default assumption that reproduction of works requires the permission of the copyright owner is a poor fit for the digital environment, given that on the Internet reproduction is a routine and integral feature of the network. [read post]
11 May 2016, 12:28 am by Dieneke de Vos
Tagged: Europe, European University Institute, Gender, Gender equality, Protection of women's rights, SOU2016, State of the Union 2016, women's rights [read post]
11 May 2016, 12:28 am by Dieneke de Vos
Tagged: Europe, European University Institute, Gender, Gender equality, Protection of women's rights, SOU2016, State of the Union 2016, women's rights [read post]
5 May 2016, 4:52 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Any unauthorized reproduction or retransmission of any blog post without the express written consent of CHL is prohibited. [read post]
5 May 2016, 2:21 pm by Jonathan Frieden
Generally, the unauthorized reproduction of a copyrighted work is unlawful. [read post]
3 May 2016, 10:00 am by Reproductive Rights
Center for Reproductive Rights Press Release (Apr. 1, 2016): Case of Illegal Detention and Death of Woman at Hospital Heads to High Court of Nigeria: With support from the Center for Reproductive Rights, an advocacy group has filed suit in... [read post]
3 May 2016, 6:29 am
Based on these actions, the court found that IFP had infringed the plaintiffs’ exclusive right to reproduction and distribution under s.106 of the US Copyright Act 1976, (USCA) and their importation rights under s.602(a)(1) USCA 1976.The Court did not consider whether IFP also infringed the performance right because “any works implicated in performance-related infringement are covered by IFP’s other infringements. [read post]
2 May 2016, 3:32 am
.** Paint it VantablackIs it possible to have the exclusive rights over a colour - the "blackest black ever"? [read post]