Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 4181 - 4200 of 10,137
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2014, 7:08 am by admin
Coca-Cola Co.); increasing ongoing debate about whether photo-shopped advertising should be banned or regulated in the United States; and then this morning what I thought was a very interesting comment on a potential lawsuit by the Center for Science in the Public Interest (“CSPI”) against Campbell Soup Company for alleged false marketing claims for its V8 Splash and V8 V-Fusion Refresher drinks (see: here). [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 8:27 pm by James Yang
The Supreme Court of the United States disagreed noting that laches is no longer a defense to patent infringement to cut short or cut off damages to the patent owner. [read post]
16 May 2007, 9:56 am
Beezhold specifically prescribed a short course of a particular antibiotic-gentamicin-because it is nephrotoxic, or toxic to the kidneys. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 5:25 am by Patrick McDonnell
§§ 948a et seq.] may be convened by the Secretary of Defense or by an officer or official of the United States designated by the Secretary for that purpose” (emphasis added by the court). [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 12:00 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
The recent adoption of a bilateral agreement between the United States and Bulgaria under the Convention on Cultural Property Implementation Act (CPIA) brings to mind two thoughts.First is the foundation that supports protective import measures covering designated jeopardized cultural property, specifically ancient coins that are "first discovered" within a country of origin.James Harvie Wilkinson III—who was first appointed to the federal bench by President Ronald… [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:50 am by John Elwood
United States, 12-8505, for that upstart non-relist Paroline v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:20 am by SHG
United States Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 738 F.3d 885, 892 (8th Cir. 2013) (quoting United States ex rel. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:20 am by SHG
United States Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 738 F.3d 885, 892 (8th Cir. 2013) (quoting United States ex rel. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 12:26 am by Dennis Crouch
 Note here that the argument is not based upon a statute codified in the United States Code since it is only a temporary provision that will sunset after three more years. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
Lundgren, in which the justices considered tribal immunity from state-court actions to adjudicate title to land, and United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 5:57 pm by Trey Childress
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently decided the case of Applied Medical v. [read post]
United States to support the slippery slope argument that “unconstitutional practices get their first footing…by silent approaches and slight deviations. [read post]