Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 4181 - 4200 of 13,839
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am by Stone Law, P.C.
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 3:07 pm by Jon Sands
  That holding, Judge Paez explained in his concurral opinion, flows from United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 9:34 am by ERIC J DIRGA PA
Image via Wikipedia Here are the latest United States Supreme Court Opinions with the new Justices. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:50 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday’s second argument was in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 7:00 am by James Yang
Pyro is the largest fireworks production company in the United States. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 5:01 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
And not only that, but there is a 1988 federal United States Supreme Court case, Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:01 am by Marc Climaco
On Monday the United States Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Arguing for the federal government in the case of United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:14 am by Aaron
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/11/15/08-30360.pdf United States v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:07 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Ross, a Dormant Commerce Clause challenge to California's law barring in-state sale of animal products that fail to meet California's regulatory requirements. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Steinbach, once a litigation partner Williams & Connolly LLP and latterly a teacher of United States History and American Government courses at the Sidwell Friends School in Washington, DC, on how United States history can also be taught and understood by focusing on constitutional history (YouTube). [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:36 pm by Brad Kuhn
 Because the United State Supreme Court just issued its decision in Koontz v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 9:55 am
The magistrate judge granted defendant’s motion to compel, and the United States District Court for the Northern District of California confirmed the ruling. [read post]