Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 4181 - 4200 of 15,305
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2007, 10:51 am
On July 23, 2007, the Supreme Court of Canada announced that that it will deliver its decision on Euro-Excellence, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:47 am by Sean Wajert
But these individual inquiries are incompatible with Rule 23(b)(3)’s predominance requirement. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 1:18 pm by Katherine Gallo
(c) Any party may also include a demand for the mutual and simultaneous production for inspection and copying of all discoverable reports and writings, if any, made by any expert described in subdivision (b) in the course of preparing that expert’s opinion. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:15 am
In this case, the act complained of was an offer for sale in England, on the principles laid down in L’Oreal v eBay, i.e. the defendant’s website was not merely accessible from the UK but was in fact targeted at (among others) English customers.The allegedly infringing product on Heritage Audio's sitePassing-offFor passing-off, the judge noted that the CJEU had applied the Brussels I rules not only to trade mark and copyright infringement claims but also… [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
Based upon case law to date, however, I think we would get the same outcome in the Buckeye State, on facts similar to the facts in Stambovsky v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 8:00 am by Mike Habib, EA
Under Internal Revenue Cоdе ѕесtіоn 6331, thе Intеrnаl Rеvеnuе Sеrvісе саn “lеvу uроn аll property and rіghtѕ to property” of a taxpayer whо оwеѕ Federal tаx. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:16 am
“Insignificant” means differences which are “so insignificant that they may go unnoticed by the average consumer”, the Court of Justice of the European Union’s (CJEU) identity test in Case C-291/00 LTJ Diffusion. [read post]