Search for: "State v. Childs"
Results 4181 - 4200
of 18,878
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2010, 7:43 am
CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:35 am
However, according to Wamsley v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:35 am
However, according to Wamsley v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 10:03 am
Jacobson v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 1:42 pm
(Indian Child Welfare Act) U.S. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 9:46 am
Although in Elk v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 7:51 am
Exceptional Child Center, in which a divided Court held that Medicaid providers do not have a cause of action to challenge a state’s reimbursement rates, garnered considerable coverage and commentary. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:41 pm
The case is the People v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:20 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 6:05 pm
In United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 5:10 am
Supreme Court plurality ruled today (Coleman v Maryland Court of Appeals, March 20, 2012, Kennedy, A). [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 8:36 am
Body: SC19341 - State v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 1:15 pm
(First Amendment; Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act; Security Threat Group) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2024.html Jeremiah Sipp v. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 10:58 am
Some states may require the custodial parent involved to give written notice of a move that is intended to the other parent. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:57 am
His car hits the child, causing her to sustain severe injuries. [read post]
4 May 2016, 8:00 am
MCR 7.213(C) states that child custody cases are given priority on the session calendar. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 4:35 am
State v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 10:09 am
Child Poverty Action Group, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2009] EWCA Civ 1058 This is a benefits case rather than housing per se, but it concerns an important point which will affect many. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 12:21 pm
(See Price v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 4:46 am
The complaint (full text of complaint and brief in support) in State of Texas v. [read post]