Search for: "State v. Dominic"
Results 4181 - 4200
of 4,537
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2020, 7:04 am
The executive branch is likely to play the dominant role in these interpretive exercises and may be able to shape the outcome in a way that lets it preserve its preferred policy priorities. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:47 am
Ventures, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 9:05 pm
Sullivan v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 8:00 am
May 15, 2020: Quarterly Percentage of Internet Usage (PIU) Certification – USF prepaid calling card providers must file a certification stating that it is making the required USF contributions. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 11:45 am
Unions, cooperatives and the State still had some form of positive connotations in the West. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 5:31 am
See CTIA -- The Wireless Association v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 2:52 pm
The EEOC’s challenges to employer hiring practices dominated with 23% of successful conciliations, followed by reasonable accommodation practices at 21%. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 10:14 pm
Unlike United States works, there is no requirement for the foreign works to have been registered in the US Copyright Office. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 5:19 am
On paper, we’re a one-person-one-vote nation; in reality, we’re more than a bit of an oligarchy, in which a handful of wealthy people dominate. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:50 am
As for Yorkshire Warrior, the identity of the goods and the distinctive character of the trade mark again favoured a likelihood of confusion: the allegedly infringing white rose device was both closer to the trade mark and was more dominant than in the case of Yorkshire Bitter. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 12:54 am
District Court to one count of conspiring to bribe a state judge. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 3:25 pm
Maybe the best example I can think of is 1974, U.S. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 8:32 pm
By Cara CooksonState v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:02 pm
Desai, Lee v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court struck down a Louisiana law that required abortion providers to obtain admitting privileges at a hospital and affirmed the Court’s previous decision in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 2:23 pm
Our proposal codifies the approach the Ninth Circuit took in CFTC v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
Yet it was just a few months ago that disgraced former film producer and Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein was found guilty of two of the five charges he faced in New York state court. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
Putin ("President Vladimir V. [read post]
30 May 2014, 4:40 am
Productions v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:52 am
The upshot of the points, taken together, is that Hobby Lobby's own brief calls into serious question whether the plaintiffs have alleged facts sufficient to establish that the HHS rule imposes a substantial burden on their exercise of religion.As for the first question: Hobby Lobby's brief, like Conestoga Wood's, confirms that these cases are not really about the question of corporate religious exercise that has dominated the briefing and public reporting.Hobby Lobby makes… [read post]
