Search for: "State v. House" Results 4181 - 4200 of 28,789
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2012, 8:20 am by Bryan Heaney
An Extra Division of the Inner House decided that, interpreting the words of the provision in the statutory context, they did not create a duty on the Ministers to make regulations but were merely permissive: M v The Scottish Ministers [2011] CSIH 19, 2011 SLT 787. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 9:17 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
MishkinThirteen amicus briefs have been filed in Township of Mount Holly v. [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 1:36 pm
  The restaurant stated that they wanted to use Cobb’s picture however, her licensing fees were too high. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 1:11 pm by WIMS
The Letter states that the FAA agrees with an expert panel's finding that the City's plan to reopen a coastal garbage transfer facility in College Point, Queens, would be compatible with safe air operations as long as several recommendations are followed. [read post]
4 Apr 2006, 8:45 am
United Kingdom (see previous post and comments), the concept again figures prominently in last week's United States Supreme Court decision in Georgia v. [read post]
However, voting rights groups have obtained records from Kobach's own office that deflate his claims that "[v]oter fraud is a well-documented reality in American elections. [read post]
29 May 2015, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
One of the coordinates was [Sammie’s] mother’s house, where he was living. . . . [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 1:52 pm by NL
As an illustration of how complex housing law has become, and how difficult for a litigant in person, comes Sheppard v London Borough of Richmond-Upon-Thames [2012] EWCA Civ 302. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 1:52 pm by NL
As an illustration of how complex housing law has become, and how difficult for a litigant in person, comes Sheppard v London Borough of Richmond-Upon-Thames [2012] EWCA Civ 302. [read post]