Search for: "State v. Maker"
Results 4181 - 4200
of 4,682
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2009, 10:30 am
Wyeth v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 12:09 pm
The defendant in UMG Recordings, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 4:18 pm
The US Supreme Court says that federal drug laws and regulations do not preempt a personal injury lawsuit filed against drug maker Wyeth. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 6:54 am
" He would "have gone further than the court's liberals in a decision that allowed injured patients to sue drug makers" according to the "24-page concurrence" where "he said the court should have declared that judges have no authority to void state consumer-protection laws based on 'agency musings' from Washington. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 6:54 am
" He would "have gone further than the court's liberals in a decision that allowed injured patients to sue drug makers" according to the "24-page concurrence" where "he said the court should have declared that judges have no authority to void state consumer-protection laws based on 'agency musings' from Washington. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 6:30 am
Levine, that drug makers are not exempt from state tort liability (tort reform vs. plaintiffs’ bar); and by the nomination of Kathleen Sibelius to head HHS (pro-choice vs. pro-life). [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 9:00 pm
Ashcroft v. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 11:21 am
In a recent speech to a joint session of Congress given in February, President Obama stated that “[he] believe[s] the nation that invented the automobile cannot walk away from it. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 7:41 pm
Supreme Court ruled that federal approval of a drug is no protection from lawsuits in state courts over safety issues that arise later -- a decision that could have implications for Eli Lilly and Co. and other pharmaceutical makers. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 3:56 pm
" In 2008, "the Supreme Court agreed with the pre-emption policy in a case [Riegel v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:36 pm
Last year, in Riegel v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 6:49 am
In writing for the majority, Justice John Paul Stevens said it was possible for Wyeth to comply with both federal and state laws in this matter. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 9:55 pm
As I have explained elsewhere, policy-makers should be helping consumers get relevant content, not enacting laws to take it away from them. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 3:59 pm
” Riegel v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 10:37 am
Supreme Court has issued its long-awaited decision in Wyeth v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 8:21 am
Wyeth v .Levine!!!! [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 8:21 am
Wyeth v .Levine!!!! [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 8:17 am
The Court, in Wyeth v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:38 am
The court brushed away a plea that it limit lawsuits against drug makers. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 3:12 am
Summary of Decision issued February 18, 2009Case Name: Sheaffer V. [read post]
