Search for: "State v. Mark" Results 4181 - 4200 of 19,839
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2014, 3:44 am
 and that Coley's use of the mark was without due cause. [read post]
Kolarik II, “Implications of the Supreme Court’s Historic Decision in Wayfair,” State Tax Notes, July 9, 2018, p. 125. [4] See, e.g., Bridges v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Under this standard, the court finds that plaintiff’s allegations that defendants’ malpractice resulted in its loss of licensing fees that would have been paid by MasterCard for the use of the Mark and caused plaintiff to incur legal fees are sufficient to state a claim for damages attributable to defendants’ malpractice. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Betty Lupinacci
This new tax was challenged in court and the Supreme Court, in Pollock v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 5:43 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Constitution requires all states to license a marriage between two persons of the same gender and to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states.In reaching this conclusion, Justice Kennedy discussed how the institution of marriage has evolved since the Colonial era, marked by arranged marriages. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The Supreme Court recently agreed to consider Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. [read post]