Search for: "State v. Marks" Results 4181 - 4200 of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2016, 2:21 am
On March 10, 2016, the USPTO issued Trademark Examination Guide 01-16, stating that the Office will be suspending action on pending applications involving marks subject to refusal under the disparagement and the scandalousness provisions of Lanham Act Section 2(a). [read post]
10 Apr 2025, 3:37 am by Oliver Fairhurst
The state of play in the UK courts Q1: Did the Aldi product take unfair advantage of the reputation of the Thatchers mark? [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 1:00 am by INFORRM
This has recently been developed from an understanding of the right as being a relatively narrow one, which is to do with receiving information that others are willing to impart (found in Leander v Sweden (1987) EHRR 43), to a relatively broad one, which now encompasses receiving information held by an organ of the state, free of unjustified administrative obstacles (found in Tarsasag a Szabadsagjogokert v Hungary (2009) ECHR 618 and Kenedi v Hungary (2009) ECHR… [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 3:44 am
 and that Coley's use of the mark was without due cause. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 12:49 pm
| AIPPI event on EU trade mark reform | Ex Deep Purple member registers band name as trade mark | Copyright in the telephone directory [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Burke, P.C., 187 AD3d 503, 503 [1st Dept 2020] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]