Search for: "State v. Record"
Results 4181 - 4200
of 44,304
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2008, 1:40 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 6:12 am
State v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 4:42 pm
New York State Department of Financial Services As counsel of record for the Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Indians and the Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians, Rosette, LLP wishes to express its views regarding the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s recent decision in Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Indians v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 4:56 am
Waldon v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 3:19 pm
Related Issues: Mass Surveillance TechnologiesState Surveillance & Human RightsState-Sponsored MalwareRelated Cases: Kidane v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 12:06 pm
V. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 3:03 am
Brown v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
And as the “internet of things” begins to take off, we will see information about the interior of our homes and the state of our bodies being constantly collected and stored in the cloud. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 5:49 pm
State, that panel affirmed Pendergrass' conviction of child molesting, find the DNA report to be a business record. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 191 AD3d… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 191 AD3d… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 191 AD3d… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 191 AD3d… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 191 AD3d… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 191 AD3d… [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 5:48 am
The case is Demirchyan v Gonzales, C.D. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 11:48 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 6:23 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 12:55 pm
A few years ago, after a major inventorying project, the Law Library’s collection of United States Court of Appeals Records and Briefs was sentto our state-of-the-art off-site storage at Fort Meade for safekeeping. [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 11:27 am
United States v. [read post]
