Search for: "State v. Register"
Results 4181 - 4200
of 13,697
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2020, 2:46 pm
’” [Id., at p. 9 (quoting Gonzales v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:04 am
Morinaga & Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 6:56 am
Does this latest decision, Gaker v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
Relying on French case law, the court held that there is no infringement of trade mark rights when a first name is added to a surname already registered as a trade mark, provided that there is no state of confusion in the minds of the public be it visually, phonetically or orally. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 11:10 am
Rudnicki v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 3:33 am
Merrill Primack v. [read post]
25 May 2014, 7:50 am
David gave examples from Kohler Mira v Bristan Group [2013] EWPCC 2, Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWHC 1882 and Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWCA Civ 1339 where dotted lines were held to indicate transparency. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 9:47 am
S.A.S. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
There's no reason for the state to effectively subsidize the latter, and ample reason for them not to. [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 3:51 am
The Lanham Act (count VI) generally has been construed to protect against trademark, service mark or trade infrginement even though the mark or name has not been federally registered. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 10:14 am
Twenty years ago, in Bernstein v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:36 pm
See People v Vallencia. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 11:51 am
In 420 Caregivers v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:35 am
Leeds Group v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 11:23 am
Walden v. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 2:52 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 9:15 am
In response, Specsavers relied not on the use of the wordless mark itself, but on the use of the following logo (which became known as the ‘shaded logo’): Article 15 of the CTM Regulation states that the use of a registered trade mark may be made “in a form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character of the mark in the form in which it was registered”. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 11:19 am
As more states move toward some legalization of some marijuana use, the Coats v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 4:04 pm
V. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:05 pm
In Hall v. [read post]
