Search for: "State v. Sales"
Results 4181 - 4200
of 20,857
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2011, 10:05 am
Bevilacqua v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 1:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 12:00 pm
The majority members contended that the sale was authorized by majority consent under LLC Law Section 402(d)(2) which states that, Except as provided in the operating agreement . . . the vote of at least a majority in interest of the members entitled to vote thereon shall be required to . . . approve the sale, exchange lease mortgage, pledge or other transfer of all or substantially all of the assets of the limited liability company. [read post]
20 Aug 2006, 7:00 pm
State v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 2:31 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Nichia Corp v Argos Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 741 (19 July 2007) Avis v Turner & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 748 (19 July 2007) AWB (Geneva) SA & Anor v North America Steamships Ltd & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 739 (18 July 2007) Bibi & Ors v Entry Clearance Officer, Dhaka [2007] EWCA Civ 740 (18 July 2007) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Kelly & Anor v R. [2007] EWCA… [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 8:23 am
In Badger Capital, LLC v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 7:00 pm
The short answer is yes--but it depends.In DW Aina Le‘a Development, LLC v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 7:00 pm
The short answer is yes--but it depends.In DW Aina Le‘a Development, LLC v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 8:55 am
State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 3:52 pm
” Petitioners argue that states cannot constitutionally condition in-state sales on requiring out-of-state businesses to operate in a particular way. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:11 am
The contract of sale placed the burden on the seller to obtain any necessary court approval for the sale of its property. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:11 am
The contract of sale placed the burden on the seller to obtain any necessary court approval for the sale of its property. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 6:15 pm
LLC v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 3:05 pm
A state may ban alcohol outright, or ban its sale for consumption in public places, or impose various content-neutral speech restrictions. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:23 am
The United States Supreme Court did not disturb the concept of General Jurisdiction in Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. et al. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 2:57 pm
In AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 6:03 am
In Starker v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 5:17 am
Robson v Robson [2010] EWCA Civ 1171 may ultimately be best remembered for the language used by Lord Justice Ward in his judgment, rather than for any particular point of law. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 2:41 am
Pandozy v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 10:00 pm
Archer & White Sales, Inc. [read post]
