Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 4181 - 4200 of 16,440
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2019, 9:05 pm by Paul C. Light
Furthermore, support for federal employees appears to have risen as Americans embraced the need for a strong public service as a ballast against partisanship. [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 9:23 am by Nancy E. Halpern, D.V.M.
Outdoor domestic swine generally do not have strong biosecurity or fencing. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm by Chuck Cosson
  And, as I’ve argued in previous posts, effective rules require a strong social consensus.[18] One can certainly start by observing behavior, and from there seek to identify the nature of consciousness; in particular the rewards motivating that behavior. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 10:29 am by Patricia Hughes
This approach is more in keeping with the presidential system in, for example, the United States, and not consistent with the Westminster form of government, in which an election can occur at any time, with the approval of the Governor General. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:36 am by Florian Mueller
Later, the Court of Justice of the EU brought a bit more balance into that analysis with its Huawei v. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 6:05 am
  "We express our strong dissatisfaction and resolute opposition to the statement made by the leaders of the G7 Summit on Hong Kong affairs,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang said at a press briefing in Beijing on Tuesday. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 12:41 am by Bona Law PC
Bona Law also filed an amicus brief in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 7:31 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
A necessary precondition of a strong faculty is that it have first-hand concern with its own membership. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 4:48 pm by Neoshia Roemer
Kings County, 532 F.2d 655 (9th Cir. 1975) (held that P.L. 280 did not grant land use jurisdiction to States or Counties); Segundo v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:39 pm by Peter Margulies
Receiving asylum is difficult, in part because of the requirement noted by the Supreme Court in INS v. [read post]