Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 4181 - 4200
of 4,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2010, 4:28 am
In his brief, Salah argued that the motion to withdraw a plea should be likened to “an individual suffering from buyer’s remorse attempting to void a commercial transaction during the ‘cooling off’ period as permissible under Ohio’s consumer protection laws. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 6:37 pm
Here are a few notable reactions to the DC Circuit's Comcast v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 1:23 pm
Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:48 am
Furthermore, because these guidelines are intended to be protective of all individuals [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for alleged Clean Water Act (CWA) violations. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 1:14 pm
Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 9:08 am
In Comcast v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 8:51 am
Finally, does the FCC have the authority to protect consumers? [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 12:35 am
Keep it up, folk, says the Kat, you're doing fine! [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 9:30 am
Under Abry Partners V, L.P. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 9:48 pm
As a result, the HRRA serves to protect homeowners and other unsuspecting consumers with unequal bargaining power by providing further requirements for the validity and enforceability of their contracts. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:37 am
Eriq Gardner at THR, Esq. has the story, as does Ray Beckerman at Recording Industry v. the People. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:02 pm
Instead, the court brought up the possibility of "willful blindness. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 5:30 am
Thorogood v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 11:17 am
Companies have never been eager to have their security slip-ups revealed to consumers. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 8:31 am
Corp. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 1:18 pm
With a clear expression of your wishes, there are unlikely to be any costly, time-consuming disputes over who gets what. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
(PatLit) Battle of the patent search systems heats up! [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 1:14 pm
To understand this case, we need to flashback to 2005, when the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (or BAPCPA) was passed. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 9:17 am
(Note that, to my knowledge, the Cato Institute filed no amicus brief in Kansas v. [read post]
