Search for: "The People v. Cross"
Results 4181 - 4200
of 6,171
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2013, 12:00 am
Cross-posted from EFF. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 10:09 am
Jackson said in his famous concurring opinion in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 9:00 am
For Daskal, these factors better reflect the interests at stake in cross-border data disputes, including privacy, security, and sovereignty. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 7:30 am
This post is cross-posted on Just Security. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 2:29 pm
The case is Tavilla v. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 3:47 pm
Leaving aside the rather predictable (given the team's public dilation on the issue of a potential name change) instance of trade mark squatting, most of the IP interest came from proceedings in the TTAB and the District Court of Virginia, and the subsequent ruling of the Supreme Court in Matal v Tam. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 1:05 pm
In the last installment, I discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]
23 Aug 2014, 2:58 pm
Curran v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:36 am
There really isn't an appropriate photo for this case.State v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 8:20 pm
The theme of the conference is IP and Migration, which aims to highlight movement of people, practices, and technologies from one place to another, crossing physical borders and metaphysical barriers. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 2:02 pm
While many people say that GDPR is much more privacy protective, there are many circumstances where personal data can be processed without consent, but based on a legitimate interest. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:15 pm
Our reports on the civil oral arguments of the Illinois Supreme Court's November term conclude with Poris v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 8:40 am
In the last installment, I discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 10:02 am
People v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:56 am
One would think that Shields has a good case that the uses constitute "fair use" - not least from the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Bill Graham Archives v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 2:02 pm
While many people say that GDPR is much more privacy protective, there are many circumstances where personal data can be processed without consent, but based on a legitimate interest. [read post]
20 May 2020, 3:03 pm
Their lawsuits and threats are attempts at rent-seeking; they’re demanding money from people who make, use, or sell technology just for doing what they were already doing—for crossing the proverbial “bridge” that the patent troll has decided to lurk under. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 7:04 am
Oakley, John V. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 12:53 pm
Vann Woodward, this left little for public education, public health, and aid-dependent people such as the insane and the blind. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 5:14 pm
Cindy first became involved with EFF in 1993, when EFF asked her to serve as the outside lead attorney in Bernstein v. [read post]
