Search for: "U.S. CONGRESS"
Results 4181 - 4200
of 58,700
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2023, 2:38 am
Applying the U.S. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 1:03 pm
The US Department of Justice (DOJ) released a report Friday alleging that the Minneapolis Police Department (MPD) “engage[d] in a pattern or practice of conduct in violation of the U.S. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 7:57 am
One is that it is a fundamental norm rooted in the rule-of-law; another is that it is an emergent norm rooted in historical practice, either since the beginning of the Republic, or in some alternative formulations, a modern emergent norm that has been U.S. practice since the pardon of Nixon. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 1:37 am
The U.S. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 2:50 pm
It’s to keep secrets from Americans, Congress, and public courts. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 2:02 pm
Under U.S. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 1:12 pm
A U.S. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:54 pm
One legislative agency is the Library of Congress, which provides a research and information hub for Congress. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:25 pm
A bill to renew auction authority passed out of the U.S. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:11 pm
United States, 571 U.S. 204 (2014). [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm
”[18] The Court noted that “[t]he District Court had rightly concluded that because VIP used the challenged marks as source identifiers, it could not benefit from the fair-use exclusion for parody” and while the Circuit Court’s erroneous construction “negated Congress’s judgment about when – and when not – parody (and criticism and commentary) is excluded from dilution liability. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am
”[18] The Court noted that “[t]he District Court had rightly concluded that because VIP used the challenged marks as source identifiers, it could not benefit from the fair-use exclusion for parody” and while the Circuit Court’s erroneous construction “negated Congress’s judgment about when – and when not – parody (and criticism and commentary) is excluded from dilution liability. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am
”[18] The Court noted that “[t]he District Court had rightly concluded that because VIP used the challenged marks as source identifiers, it could not benefit from the fair-use exclusion for parody” and while the Circuit Court’s erroneous construction “negated Congress’s judgment about when – and when not – parody (and criticism and commentary) is excluded from dilution liability. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:28 am
The U.S. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 9:33 am
Congress and the administration can do better, and this paper explains how. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 8:54 am
The U.S. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:52 am
Congress is unlikely to accept. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:05 am
Since meaningful change is not coming anytime soon from DOD, Congress needs to act, as it did when it ordered greater transparency surrounding military justice racial disparities. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
It may even get the Congress to reconsider the mistake that it made in 1917 — and replicated in later years. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Ferguson U.S. [read post]
